people discuss the Chris Benoit tragedy as if it were a victory that it wasn't roid rage? For example:
It's almost as if people are saying steroids are a victim of an unwarranted, vicious attack by the media. Do they think steroids are a good thing that should be embraced? Or do they just hate the media that much that they'll take the side against them whenever they can? Or do they think that the incident is somehow now better that Benoit was thinking clearly when he killed his family?
Or do they just equate this with a victory for professional wrestling, using it as "proof" that there's nothing really wrong with the sport regardless of its steroid abuse?
lol those stupid "journalits" will be kicking them selves that it wasnt roid rage
£10 says the media still blames it on 'roid rage.
Or do they just equate this with a victory for professional wrestling, using it as "proof" that there's nothing really wrong with the sport regardless of its steroid abuse?