WWE is officially lame! How could Mr.McMahon die on his own show?

#1
Look at the Sopranos type bullshit that concluded the 6/11 Draft Lottery Raw. Come on now. It's probably the worst shit to happen in storyline wrestling history. Mr. McMahon was presumed dead after his limo blew up. Whatever happened to a wrestling program. I'll be ashamed for anyone to even see me watching the shit!



What a disgrace. How do you go from a sick retarded man angle that went no where to suddenly dying in a car bombing in your limo? What next? Is WWE going to have a 2hr. funeral on the upcoming Raw? Is McMahon going to comeback from the grave and win the title again. WWE is sickening man!

ROH and TNA is where it's at!
 

tHuG $TyLe

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#2
TNA is pretty wack man, the booking is killing it...ROH is good however.

About the Vince situation, I actually thought it was a good idea, caught everyone off guard for a change. It's a way to kill of his character, and him being off TV would be a good thing.

Hey, its better than the Cancer angle he was going to do.
 
#3
TNA is pretty wack man, the booking is killing it...ROH is good however.

About the Vince situation, I actually thought it was a good idea, caught everyone off guard for a change. It's a way to kill of his character, and him being off TV would be a good thing.

Hey, its better than the Cancer angle he was going to do.

You claim TNA is wack as if the WWE is off the hook! Get that hypocrite shit out of here! TNA has 40 minutes a week to showcase their stuff. And with that said, Impact for like the past 2 months has been better than Raw. TNA with 2hrs. was killing WWE as a product back in the day. Give TNA 5hrs like WWE and you'll tell me the correct answer about who's better. WWE has 5hrs a week and still comes up half ass with wrestling and then come up with stupid theatrical shit like limos blowing up and people dying.

And :laugh: at being caught off guard. That limo shit is the oldest trick in the book. You must not watch enough movies.

And again, another :laugh: at Vince being off of TV for good. Vince will be back reincarnated next year. WWE is lame. Open your eyes. Anything>WWE!
 

tHuG $TyLe

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#4
You claim TNA is wack as if the WWE is off the hook! Get that hypocrite shit out of here! TNA has 40 minutes a week to showcase their stuff. And with that said, Impact for like the past 2 months has been better than Raw. TNA with 2hrs. was killing WWE as a product back in the day. Give TNA 5hrs like WWE and you'll tell me the correct answer about who's better. WWE has 5hrs a week and still comes up half ass with wrestling and then come up with stupid theatrical shit like limos blowing up and people dying.

And :laugh: at being caught off guard. That limo shit is the oldest trick in the book. You must not watch enough movies.

And again, another :laugh: at Vince being off of TV for good. Vince will be back reincarnated next year. WWE is lame. Open your eyes. Anything>WWE!
I never said WWE was any good I even said ROH was good, did you miss that part?, I have said before Raw and WWECW suck. Smackdown is the only show I watch and is the only one which showcases wrestling. Although that will take a hit due to Beniot/Kennedy/Booker leaving. So what hypocritical shit are you on about? :rolleyes:

I said "Vince being off tv would be a GOOD THING" Not For good. Obviously its not for good, its Vince. Again, wtf? Did you even read what I said? or just skim through it and just assume shit?

Vince Russo or whoever books the damn gimmick matches is ruining TNA. I never spoke about Impact in the past, in the past Impact was pretty good, but its getting lame and corny. The fact TNA fans were even pissed off at the company over certain things, especially how the Joe v Angle shit was done at the start.

and :laugh: back at you. Didn't know the TNA comment would get under your skin so much, but dissing the 'holy grail' TNA in wrestling debates gets people pissed it seems and you get the normal "wwe sucks, il never watch it again" reply...then people watch Raw/Ecw/Sd! the next week to moan some more.
 
#5
I never said WWE was any good I even said ROH was good, did you miss that part?, I have said before Raw and WWECW suck. Smackdown is the only show I watch and is the only one which showcases wrestling. Although that will take a hit due to Beniot/Kennedy/Booker leaving. So what hypocritical shit are you on about? :rolleyes:
You said TNA was wack and then tried to praise that corny as McMahon "death" angle. That's hypocritical to me.

I said "Vince being off tv would be a GOOD THING" Not For good. Obviously its not for good, its Vince. Again, wtf? Did you even read what I said? or just skim through it and just assume shit?
You said it's a way to kill off the character off of tv. So if the character is being killed off then how how the fuck can you sit up here and say it's "obviously not for good"? You applaud it because it got the job done and now you're agreeing with me saying that he'll be on tv again. You agree that the man is killed! And when you get killed, I believe your not suppose to comeback again. The man is suppose to be dead. And now you're saying, he's not going to be off tv for good. Or when Vince comes back from the dead to regain the ECW title are you going to shrug that off and say it got the job done?

Vince Russo or whoever books the damn gimmick matches is ruining TNA. I never spoke about Impact in the past, in the past Impact was pretty good, but its getting lame and corny. The fact TNA fans were even pissed off at the company over certain things, especially how the Joe v Angle shit was done at the start.
:laugh: You don't even have your info straight. And your not even up to par with your arguement. When was the last time you even watched Impact? Compare Impact from last year to now and you'll see how Impact has improved. The promos have gotten better, backstage segments are a little more entertaining, and the wrestling matches have been made a little longer. Don't sit up here and tell me no bullshit about Impact getting lame, especially since last week's Storm/Harris match was better than anything WWE programming has done in a while. When it comes to Russo, TNA has said that Russo plays the role of an advisor and is now only currently involved in the VKM situation. Using Russo as a cop out as to take points from TNA-lame.


and :laugh: back at you. Didn't know the TNA comment would get under your skin so much, but dissing the 'holy grail' TNA in wrestling debates gets people pissed it seems and you get the normal "wwe sucks, il never watch it again" reply...then people watch Raw/Ecw/Sd! the next week to moan some more.
"Holy Grail"? I wonder where you got that from? Not only does your comments sound like they have no originality but your whole state of mind is a duplicate. And the reason, I'm pissed is because I had a feeling where your arguement was going. You sound like a true WWF fan justifying that dumb shit by saying it was good but then in the same breathe trying to take away from TNA. WWE's been around for decades and this is the only way they can come up with getting rid of an onscreen character? The promotion should be ashamed of themselves and you should be ashamed for applauding it. I'll continue to watch WWE cause there's nothing to watch during most of the time they're on during the week. Plus I'm curious about how things will look after this draft.
 

Snowman

Well-Known Member
#8
as next monday rolls around. you'll hear Vince escaped thru the other side of the limo. Mr Mcmahon suffered minor injuries hes resting in his home in Stamford.

Vinces company he can bring himself back anytime he wants. if Vince does come back on TV he wont be the asshole arrogant SOB. he'll be back as a babyface good character. (NOW REMEMBER when Bischoff was on TV and nights when Vince got up in his face and the night Eric got fired) the audience loved that.

he should be backstage for a while. give some of these characters there time to develop.

TNA would be a whole lot better if they did get a 2 hour format. whats hurting WWE is ECW. get rid of ECW have RAW and SD draft from that show. build up rosters for monday and friday night.
 
#9
Ever since they bought out all their competition and took the F out of their name for the E, it's been retarded. Like isn't their target audience 18-34 year olds? And isn't something as stupid as having your car bombed on national tv an insult to your intelligence? Like do they actually expect 18-34 yr. olds to buy into that? I can't just suspend disbelief for this type of bull. This storyline is as bad as Katie Vick. If they want to push the envelope, at least incorporate it in a way that makes sense and is exciting and is suiting enough for wrestling and all demographics. I wouldn't be surprised if soon this company started using gun violence to kill off on screen characters!

And the thing is Vince can appear on Raw next Monday, and you all will forget about it. But hey, if you feel it's good, then kudos to you. Maybe the WWE should start giving you guys more of this stuff if you actually feel it's good entertainment. Maybe the show will start getting more positive reviews.
 
#10
is this really any worse than when Rock tossed Steve Austin off a bridge in Detroit back in the day? this isn't anything new. whats-his-face, that referee, didn't he "commit suicide?" hell, they even once killed off Al Snow's dog Pepper in a sick joke that saw Al eat his own damn pet lol. they've been "killing off" characters for a while. it was lame then, and it still is now.
 
#11
You forgot Al Wilson.

But no, it's not the same. WWE specifically stated that their shows would never contain death (I don't think Pepper counts). If McMahon is "dead", then they've completely contradicted themselves.

as next monday rolls around. you'll hear Vince escaped thru the other side of the limo. Mr Mcmahon suffered minor injuries hes resting in his home in Stamford.
Surely the medical staff, firefighters, or someone else in the vicinity would have noticed Vince lying there with minor injuries? WWE.com says McMahon wasn't found, dead or alive.

whats hurting WWE is ECW. get rid of ECW have RAW and SD draft from that show. build up rosters for monday and friday night.
They can't just turn around to Sci-Fi and say "We're not going to do any more ECW shows, k?". They have a contract.

Ever since they bought out all their competition and took the F out of their name for the E, it's been retarded.
Why do people point to the name as if it actually affected the content of the show?

Like isn't their target audience 18-34 year olds? And isn't something as stupid as having your car bombed on national tv an insult to your intelligence? Like do they actually expect 18-34 yr. olds to buy into that? I can't just suspend disbelief for this type of bull.
More of an insult to your intelligence than anything they've done with Undertaker or Kane? Were you complaining back in WWE's prime when The Undertaker was shooting lightning from his hands, or Kane was setting people on fire via pyrokinesis.

I like how you jump to the conclusion that Vince is actually "dead", despite having no information about the angle. Did you read the article on WWE.com? Notice how many times they mention the lack of a body being found?
 

Snowman

Well-Known Member
#12
its TV Illuminatile. they can say anything they want. i just read the story they blew up the limo sunday. and production made it look legit like it actually happened. WWE went out and torched the limo so the fans would believe that it was real.
 
#13
It was Vince McMahon Appreciation night...my guess is vince faked his death so people would REALLY appreciate him and he would see everyone's reactions....just my guess...

and as far as Vince goes, i guess im the only one who likes him, it makes raw alot better when hes on there, hes always sayin some funny shit... ("its gonna be you shawn, and your partner, God....against me.........and the product of my semen, Shane McMahon"....LMAO)
 

tHuG $TyLe

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#14
You said TNA was wack and then tried to praise that corny as McMahon "death" angle. That's hypocritical to me.

You said it's a way to kill off the character off of tv. So if the character is being killed off then how how the fuck can you sit up here and say it's "obviously not for good"? You applaud it because it got the job done and now you're agreeing with me saying that he'll be on tv again. You agree that the man is killed! And when you get killed, I believe your not suppose to comeback again. The man is suppose to be dead. And now you're saying, he's not going to be off tv for good. Or when Vince comes back from the dead to regain the ECW title are you going to shrug that off and say it got the job done?


:laugh: You don't even have your info straight. And your not even up to par with your arguement. When was the last time you even watched Impact? Compare Impact from last year to now and you'll see how Impact has improved. The promos have gotten better, backstage segments are a little more entertaining, and the wrestling matches have been made a little longer. Don't sit up here and tell me no bullshit about Impact getting lame, especially since last week's Storm/Harris match was better than anything WWE programming has done in a while. When it comes to Russo, TNA has said that Russo plays the role of an advisor and is now only currently involved in the VKM situation. Using Russo as a cop out as to take points from TNA-lame.

"Holy Grail"? I wonder where you got that from? Not only does your comments sound like they have no originality but your whole state of mind is a duplicate. And the reason, I'm pissed is because I had a feeling where your arguement was going. You sound like a true WWF fan justifying that dumb shit by saying it was good but then in the same breathe trying to take away from TNA. WWE's been around for decades and this is the only way they can come up with getting rid of an onscreen character? The promotion should be ashamed of themselves and you should be ashamed for applauding it. I'll continue to watch WWE cause there's nothing to watch during most of the time they're on during the week. Plus I'm curious about how things will look after this draft.
How can I say "its not for good" because its a TV show. :laugh: If the Undertaker can comeback everysingle time he loses a casket match (a buring one) or a buried alive match, I'm pretty sure WWE can make something up. Retarded or not.

No I don't think he shouldve been the ECW champ in the first place, that was as dumb as when he won the world title. And no I don't justify everything WWE does, If they did the cancer angle that would be the most retarded shit ever and I didn't agree with the God angle they had. So stop assuming shit.

The last time i saw Impact was a month ago, as when I dont like a product I don't watch it, then moan about it. I prefer the TNA PPV's (apart from Lockdown) which was a gimmick fest.
Didn't Impact have less wrestling and more segments awhile back, Like Raw and that the Matt Hardy v Kennedy match on SD! went longer then the whole on Impacts wrestling?
 
#17
Why do people point to the name as if it actually affected the content of the show?
Maybe because it's proving to be a fact. Ever since they incorporated the Entertainment in their actual name, it's given them more leeway to do over the top stupid things now that they are more open about it. And now they come up with theatrical shit like car bombs and deaths, whereas years ago during the Attitude Era, WWE said they'll never incorporate death..

I even read somewhere, that they want Steve-O and the rest of the Jackass crew to mainevent at Summerslam. Just another example of what the Entertainment stamp is allowing the company to go.

More of an insult to your intelligence than anything they've done with Undertaker or Kane? Were you complaining back in WWE's prime when The Undertaker was shooting lightning from his hands, or Kane was setting people on fire via pyrokinesis.
No because things like that made for a good stage show. They were made as characters with supernatural powers. That was actually entertaining. And it's not comparable to a guy getting tossed in a river. And mainly, it's not comparable to a guy dying in a car bomb, which is not entertaining.

I like how you jump to the conclusion that Vince is actually "dead", despite having no information about the angle. Did you read the article on WWE.com? Notice how many times they mention the lack of a body being found?
I love how you jujmped to the conclusion that I jumped to a conclusion. There was a 10 bell salute on ECW. Not to mention, I found this article here saying, "The “Who tried to kill Mr. McMahon?” angle is expected to dominate WWE television for the foreseeable future and is based on “Who Shot J.R” on Dallas several years ago." So far, the company is assuming he's dead. So since I'll suspend disbelief like you WWE viewers, I'll play along and say he's dead too.
 
#18
How can I say "its not for good" because its a TV show. :laugh: If the Undertaker can comeback everysingle time he loses a casket match (a buring one) or a buried alive match, I'm pretty sure WWE can make something up. Retarded or not.
keyword: loses. losing a match and passing a way are two completely different things.

If they did the cancer angle that would be the most retarded shit ever and I didn't agree with the God angle they had. So stop assuming shit.
The cancer angle would've been bad, but nothing was ever announced about him having cancer. Creative could've simply said that the chairman was sick and was taking time off. But they want to move in a corny Hollywood direction, so hey.

The last time i saw Impact was a month ago, as when I dont like a product I don't watch it, then moan about it. I prefer the TNA PPV's (apart from Lockdown) which was a gimmick fest.
Didn't Impact have less wrestling and more segments awhile back, Like Raw and that the Matt Hardy v Kennedy match on SD! went longer then the whole on Impacts wrestling?
And who's to blame for Impact's time restraints Given the time they're working with they're doing a very good job getting things across. Let me run through this: Harris/Storm has been better than any WWE match in the past few weeks. Kazarian/Sabin has been better than any WWE match in the past few weeks. Paparazzi segments have remained point on since day one. Anything involving Cage is great. Christian Cage>>Any champ in WWE right now. And the Steiners ripping apart 3D's legacy some weeks ago was the best promo in years period. Don't sit up here and try to tell me TNA is wack. Sure they lack in some areas, but given the proper time, they'll be far superior to WWE as a product as they were back in their early days.

I'm not even going to get started on ROH.

My whole point is that at this stage in the game and given the amount of time WWE has each week, they should be far superior than to these five year old products, which btw have a right to make mistakes while trying to grow.
 
#20
Thats a whack angle though....it makes wrestling that much more of a soap opera then it already is. It's a sad attempt to pump life into a show thats lost that edge in terms of characters and matches.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top