Theoretical max speeds are not reachable under typical deployments. To achieve those you'd need a sole device connected to a single tower next to it, and with 100% prioritized network traffic. They only do that for the tests before they launch a given tower.
LTE-Advanced, which is the modern standard for 4G has a theoretical speed of up to 1Gb/s and typically reaches 200-220Mb/s in large cities (some carriers realistically reach ~500Mb/s), which I think is way, way more than enough for a smartphone. Even at 200Mb/s, you're burning through 1GB of data in ~35 seconds, or about one run of Speedtest.
As a matter of fact, I purposefully cap my DL speeds at 5Mb/s so I don't run out of my 5GB of monthly data by things like Youtube deciding I'm good to stream at 4K when on the move. I honestly can't tell a difference 99% of the time as most websites or messengers typically won't send data faster than that.
That's probably the best deal on any TV ever. Whoever buys this is sure to be very impressed with what they get for that price, to say the least.
That's what I see when people post their speed test results. I'm on the Sprint sub and it's one of two kinds of speed test reports. Someone getting something like 1.2 Mbps and complaining or someone getting triple digit speedtests, 200+ Mbps. Not sure on their location as they don't always share but do give a general area or city.
I agree on the speeds. I think latency is a bigger issue for a carrier. If I'm not mistaken, that can affect how long it takes for a page to simply appear on your screen. You can have 100 Mbps but if it's high latency, you stare at a white screen when a page is loading for a lot longer. At least that's my understanding of it. And you don't need 100+ Mbps to load a simple website, like SH.
I have unlimited data so it's not an issue if my speeds are "too fast" and that triggers a site to stream in 1080p or better. I know I have YouTube (Vanced) set to "Auto" so sometimes I get 1080p and sometimes I get 480. It probably depends on traffic/congestion on my local tower since I don't stream video out of the house or at work and really just use it at home to watch something while I unwind. Occasionally, I will get an MKBHD video to stream in 4K, I think, or just something higher than 1080p, but I don't really notice a difference. Not on a "tiny" phone screen as opposed to on my MBP or a high end monitor but that's OK.
About the TV, I'm glad you mentioned and explained TCL to me. I looked a bit deeper in to their reputation and Rtings speak highly of it. It looks like
the LCD TV to get if one isn't going the OLED route. And I've seen the 70-80" TVs still go for under $2500, or less. I think I was looking at the 8 series TVs. I don't know what the difference between the series are since it doesn't look to be based on the screen size. So maybe by release year?
Samsung's QLED looks like a halfway point between LCD and OLED but the pricing is still closer to an OLED, from my research. TCL makes QLED too now, I think?
Also, when comparing OLED to LCD/LED, is LED or LCD the correct term to use? I know they count as both but using them interchangeably feels weird.