You know what's in error? (shattering a certian paradox)
- Thread starter Sign Related
- Start date
okay you have just proven yourself wrong and ill end this entire arguement right now.....picture a number line
<--------------------------------------->
-2 -1 0 +1 +2
so if you have a dollar, your obviously not going to be at 0 or 2 on the number line. you will be at +1, because you have one more dollar than when you had none. but when that 1 dollar is stolen, you are correct- it does imply a negative; -1 to be exact as you said. to figure out the how much money you have you would find the sum. since you had 1 to start with you would subtract one, or (1)+(-1). since there is an equal pull in that equation to both positive and negative- the outcome must be right in the middle or neutral. i feel like im teaching first grade math. and im dont think im going to respond after this because you are getting rediculous. if all of your theory is true, tell me what is the sum of (1)+(-1)?
maybe you are jack out of a dollar but you no longer hold any possesion of it. maybe you are going to be angry and you will react to it and try to get your one dollar back so that you can go from zero to one again (0+1=1).... but chances are i am bigger than you and will beat your ass... this has got to be the most stupid arguement i have ever had, i probably shouldnt have ever engaged it it. you know what they say dont argue with fools cuz people from a distance cant tell who is who.
<--------------------------------------->
-2 -1 0 +1 +2
so if you have a dollar, your obviously not going to be at 0 or 2 on the number line. you will be at +1, because you have one more dollar than when you had none. but when that 1 dollar is stolen, you are correct- it does imply a negative; -1 to be exact as you said. to figure out the how much money you have you would find the sum. since you had 1 to start with you would subtract one, or (1)+(-1). since there is an equal pull in that equation to both positive and negative- the outcome must be right in the middle or neutral. i feel like im teaching first grade math. and im dont think im going to respond after this because you are getting rediculous. if all of your theory is true, tell me what is the sum of (1)+(-1)?
maybe you are jack out of a dollar but you no longer hold any possesion of it. maybe you are going to be angry and you will react to it and try to get your one dollar back so that you can go from zero to one again (0+1=1).... but chances are i am bigger than you and will beat your ass... this has got to be the most stupid arguement i have ever had, i probably shouldnt have ever engaged it it. you know what they say dont argue with fools cuz people from a distance cant tell who is who.
^^^That is if you go by the paradox.
But if you dont go by the paradox, and rather go the correction, then this just in:
etc, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc
1 minus 1= -1. For the simple fact you know the answer to this question: Can existance go out of existance?
^^^Doesnt get more simplier than that. In this world, only in your immagination can:
existance go out of existance.
'something' there come from 'nothing' there.
'something' there go into 'nothing' (zero) there.
0 (zero) is wanted dead or alive when it's pleasing--And that's how come the human race is caught up looking as though they are hypocrites installing a desired paradox.
Henceforth I am better than the human race (since the human race doesnt want to come into the correction). Every thing the human race touch is corrupt. So I'm an X-human (along with anyone else truely entering the era of correction). You can call me an unmasked mutant because it beats being labeled 'human' (I mean, if we all supposedly imperfect, then why be a hypocrite and hold any folks guilty?). And I am better than any God because you and I know of the hypocrisy and paradox concerning any God based on definition or religious doctrine (scripture).
Like Pac said "I will spark the brain that will change the world".
I sure made change of 0 (zero) in general. And 0 (zero) cant rule the world, but 1 (one) can.
But if you dont go by the paradox, and rather go the correction, then this just in:
etc, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc
1 minus 1= -1. For the simple fact you know the answer to this question: Can existance go out of existance?
^^^Doesnt get more simplier than that. In this world, only in your immagination can:
existance go out of existance.
'something' there come from 'nothing' there.
'something' there go into 'nothing' (zero) there.
0 (zero) is wanted dead or alive when it's pleasing--And that's how come the human race is caught up looking as though they are hypocrites installing a desired paradox.
Henceforth I am better than the human race (since the human race doesnt want to come into the correction). Every thing the human race touch is corrupt. So I'm an X-human (along with anyone else truely entering the era of correction). You can call me an unmasked mutant because it beats being labeled 'human' (I mean, if we all supposedly imperfect, then why be a hypocrite and hold any folks guilty?). And I am better than any God because you and I know of the hypocrisy and paradox concerning any God based on definition or religious doctrine (scripture).
Like Pac said "I will spark the brain that will change the world".
I sure made change of 0 (zero) in general. And 0 (zero) cant rule the world, but 1 (one) can.
1+ -1 can be answered in two ways...
1 + -1 can = 0 except that would be going into immagination (since immagination exists amongst) in fact because only in one's immagination can that '0' (zero) be period. And just because that answer can be immagined in one's immagination, stating the answer is 0 (zero), even there in the immagination itself, means you're in error and functioning under a paradox.
But outside of that obvious immagination, 1 + -1 = 1 + -1 which can be accepted as the final answer (mainly because of existance). Again, answer it with 0 (zero) and you're back inside of a paradox inside your imagination.
Let me ask you this:
1. Did existance itself come from nothing itself?
2. Does existance go out of existance?
3. Of existance, does existance go into non-existance?
And if mrm cops out, who else would like to feel what it feels like to be in his shoes? Step on up.
1 + -1 can = 0 except that would be going into immagination (since immagination exists amongst) in fact because only in one's immagination can that '0' (zero) be period. And just because that answer can be immagined in one's immagination, stating the answer is 0 (zero), even there in the immagination itself, means you're in error and functioning under a paradox.
But outside of that obvious immagination, 1 + -1 = 1 + -1 which can be accepted as the final answer (mainly because of existance). Again, answer it with 0 (zero) and you're back inside of a paradox inside your imagination.
Let me ask you this:
1. Did existance itself come from nothing itself?
2. Does existance go out of existance?
3. Of existance, does existance go into non-existance?
And if mrm cops out, who else would like to feel what it feels like to be in his shoes? Step on up.
After taking photos...
The photos are on a roll and are considered the negative (-) prints, not considered the neutral (zero) prints.
Then, once the negative (-) prints are delevolped, here comes all the positive prints made from em, not 'here comes all the netrual (zero) prints made from em'.
Ha!
Which of you can see that the transfer from negative print to positive print can not go to a 'netrual' (zera) print.
^^^Truth is truth. Fact is fact. Only in your immagination can you deny a truth as truth or deny a fact as fact. People need to wake up from dreaming.
The photos are on a roll and are considered the negative (-) prints, not considered the neutral (zero) prints.
Then, once the negative (-) prints are delevolped, here comes all the positive prints made from em, not 'here comes all the netrual (zero) prints made from em'.
Ha!
Which of you can see that the transfer from negative print to positive print can not go to a 'netrual' (zera) print.
^^^Truth is truth. Fact is fact. Only in your immagination can you deny a truth as truth or deny a fact as fact. People need to wake up from dreaming.
rofl, this shit is hilarious
0 is pretty crazy though. say you have dogs,2 dogs. now lets say you have 0 dogs, its unneccesary because you cant have 0 dogs either you have 1 or you have none.0 its self is redundant
^btw it made sense when i typed it, but now that i read it more it sounds stupid as hell......oh well fuck it. :thumb:
0 is pretty crazy though. say you have dogs,2 dogs. now lets say you have 0 dogs, its unneccesary because you cant have 0 dogs either you have 1 or you have none.0 its self is redundant
^btw it made sense when i typed it, but now that i read it more it sounds stupid as hell......oh well fuck it. :thumb:
so i have one dog if i shoot it in the head have i now got -1 dogs?
but if i cant have 0 dogs then how can i have -1 dogs?
0 is the starting point. 0 is there to explain the existance of nothingness. your saying that if something exists then it always exists. but there are no dogs infront of my face so there are no dogs.
but if i cant have 0 dogs then how can i have -1 dogs?
0 is the starting point. 0 is there to explain the existance of nothingness. your saying that if something exists then it always exists. but there are no dogs infront of my face so there are no dogs.
Donate
Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.
Members online
No members online now.