You know what's in error? (shattering a certian paradox)

#1
Including 0 (zero) in:

counting in general
time
days of the month
years
calulations
ages

It is amazing how far and deep this ultimate error went. And it sure got the human race defined as retarted or under some on-going retardation.

If you're going to include "0" then that means you have to start with the very "0" before the "1" in general. And we all honestly can tell that dont go right, and that people have been leaving off the "0" before the "1" just to suit whatever it be.

Hold your hands up!

There cant be 10 fingers there by an actual fact. You either have to count the first finger as "0" on one of your hands. That would make one hand 0-4 and the other hand 5-9.

^^^And that reveals the error and reveals the error is only corrected when you loose "0" in general (Drop the 0, 10, 20, etc; 100, 110, etc; 1000, 1001, 1110, etc--You get the drift--Along with the label names of them).

The definition, to say, 11, should be: Greater than 9, but lesser than 12. On my hand there is 11 fingers in fact, not 10 since we knowing dont count the "0" before the "1"--and even if we did count the "0" before the "1" there still can not be 10 fingers.

Calulations... 5 TIMES 2 (for example) should equal 11 (defined as greater than 9, but lesser than 12).

The world is so in error we must reset a lot.

On a clock... Instead of 1:00 am (which is obviouly not even 1 'O clock because there are two Os) it should be 1:1 am. That's right, not 1:01 am, 1:1 am. You can guess what the rest should be concerning time on a watch or on a clock. The only honest thing shaped as an "O" is the shape of the round clock itself, because acually "0" (zero) has an oval shape.

In a month... We obviously dont go it's March 0...No, we go it's March 1st... So then, again, there shouldnt be a "0" in any bit of any mouth.

"0" shows no means or no value.

In age... It is still in error even though the "0" is counted because of the rest I just went over. When a baby comes just out of their mother are they in "0" hours (though we know there is an hour upon?), "0" months (though we know a mouth is upon?), and "0" years (though we know a year is upon?)? I tell you, they are of that hour (which is valued as an hour) and of that mouth (which is valued as a month) and of that year (which is valued as a year). For they are of the earth.

No need to go back in time an correct from there, but we can correct the error henceforth when we want from now. Right now it's such a dark era of error we under. How can we correct the year without going back in time? It's simple, just state it's 2115 instead of 2005 and go from there. And some time right then some of us literally will have left the dark ages. Correcting the error where you stand puts you a century ahead. You'd look back and say it was the smartest move.

And dont forget to add states on the list. There isnt a single state counted as "0" (0st? 0th?) so there cant be a 10th, 20th, 30th, 40th, or 50th state.

The U.S. is 51 states in fact. Like Pac said "Got me crooked in all 50 states".

And 50 Cent? Hahaha, that name is as crooked as staged beef looks.

2,4,6,8,11 = even numbers
1,3,5,7,9 = odd number
0,10,20,30,40 = even odder numbers--Get it? even odder? These are a paradox.
 
#5
THA WILD said:
So, 11 is an even number now? You are retarded beyond comprehension.
Because 11, in the correction of the error, is then greater than 9, but lesser than 12.

Like I said a lot gotta be reset. Only ones under retardation go by the error. Obviously not me. :p

And the "12" obviously, once reset, is then an odd number. You get the drift from there.
 

Jokerman

Well-Known Member
#7
There's no error. That's why 1,2,3,... are called the counting numbers. Zero is the point of origin. All numbers measure the distance from the point of origin, the bigger the number, the farther the distance from zero. Also, zeroing in means to get to the source, to target, to get to the point. What point? The point of origin from which all numbers depart! In geometry zero is a point. If we invent our own number system, zero is any point we choose to begin.
 
#9
okay, so do you look between your legs and say you have 0 dicks? lol you must have a lot of time on your hands- either that or your smoking crack. sorry to tell you but you are completely wrong. jokerman was right on track. we use a base 10 number system. this system does start with 0 and goes to 9. counting numbers start 1,2,3. the reason why you hold your hand up and dont count the first finger as 0, is becuase 0 represents the absence of value. or the point of origin like jokerman said. so how could a finger be nothing (0). question.... do we need negative as well as positive numbers? if you say yes, then you have just proven yourself wrong. ill use one example to make a point. picture a number line; in order to have negatives on one side, and positives on the other- there must be a point where there is a transition from one to the other. this point is the point of origin- the 'neutral' point on the number line between -1, and 1. these are things that have been thought about for centuries before you...
 
#10
Well I have an example for you mrm...

Lets say you bought yourself 1 gun at exactly 4:11 pm (based on a watch)...

Now as soon as you purchased it some thief took it from you with his bare hands lol...

Anyway, the time was still 4:11 pm (based on a watch) because that's how quick the theif took your gun away...

Now, according to your logic, you'd explain to the cops that there was no hour in which the thief took it. So if they ask you in what hour the gun was stolen from you, according to your logic, you wouldnt say 4:11 pm (based on a watch) because in your logic you didnt have the gun for an hour yet.

(**Like you cant try to choose when it's only pleasing for you to like say 4:11 pm was when the gun was stolen from you to the cops. I mean, since you obviously disagree with the baby scenario in my original post too. Or else, you'd be admitting you're being a hypocritic.)

As for the fact that you even purchased the 1 gun means that now, with it stolen, you're down at having a -1 gun count materialized and on mind (negative effect alright. Or else, you wouldnt even bother reporting it to the cops if it wasnt something counted as a negative). Remember, you cant say to the cops, when they ask whose gun is stolen, that you own no gun or that you own "0" (zero) guns, when in fact, you have the 'proof of purchase' and it was stolen from you. For if that were possible, that you own no gun or that you own 0 (zero) guns, just because it was stolen, you'd be wasting the cops time, now wouldnt you? Or better yet, you'd be lieing to a police officer.

Ha!

Like Pac said, "I saw Arnoldsworzanegger bust somebody in the movie, and now I wanna do it too. oo! Niggaz is 2 through."

^^^Remember in T2, Arnold busted on his own self in the very movie as to actually having his 'left' arm? It was barely concealed, but obvious on his person and since he, as far as the movie takes you, 'left' even the tore off arm hanging around somewhere (pretending he or it was destroying himself or itself in full)--Again, Arnold in that movie busted on his (it) self. oo! Niggaz is 2 through.

And in T3, Arnold shoot donut holes many times in that other Terminator robot--And guess what?! The holes filled in. And you know you cant get 'something' from 'nothing' because 'something' had to have been there.
 
#11
adding on...

When you're born... your body didnt just *poof* out from nothing. Naw, what your born body from out your mother's womb is is made up of what is always of this earth. Cant set a new born on a count from "0" (zero) truely, now can we once we step outside of the error? We are of the earth. And if you think other wise, then you're hypocrital because even the doctors take note of the time "of" your very birth. If you were born at 1:13 on March 2nd of 1966, then the doc records that 1:13 on March 2nd of 1966, doesn't he?!

^^^Instead of being completely foolish, doctors on earth are half wise and half foolish. Foolish? They turn into getting into the whole 0 month yada yada thing just as the rest stuck under an error. So the paradox need be shattered like Pac shattered that mirror on the "Toss it up" video.
 
#18
lol @ all the pac references...and lol @ the amount of hate in this thread :p

i hear what your trying to say....

and actually i kind of agree with you....but not in the sense you might think -in terms of the universe i don't think the number "0" comes into play at all, as in, i don't beleive there are singularities within space/time...singularities being "0" -therfore why should a point of singularity come into play for us here on earth?
 
#19
Sign Related said:
Well I have an example for you mrm...

Lets say you bought yourself 1 gun at exactly 4:11 pm (based on a watch)...

Now as soon as you purchased it some thief took it from you with his bare hands lol...

Anyway, the time was still 4:11 pm (based on a watch) because that's how quick the theif took your gun away...

Now, according to your logic, you'd explain to the cops that there was no hour in which the thief took it. So if they ask you in what hour the gun was stolen from you, according to your logic, you wouldnt say 4:11 pm (based on a watch) because in your logic you didnt have the gun for an hour yet.

(**Like you cant try to choose when it's only pleasing for you to like say 4:11 pm was when the gun was stolen from you to the cops. I mean, since you obviously disagree with the baby scenario in my original post too. Or else, you'd be admitting you're being a hypocritic.)
we do use smaller units of time, and decimals/fractions help us with this problem. you wouldn't say that you had the gun for 0 hours. you would say that you bought it and had it for about 30 seconds before someone took it. if you wanted to get technical you could say you had it for .0083 hours. this can also even go into milliseconds or smaller so you wouldnt need decimals but you seem to be attached to hours for some reason. when recording time, you dont ask what hour something occured, you would ask at what time. if you bought it at 4:11 and no minutes elapse- you would say that it got stolen at 4:11 too. i dont see any problem or contradiciton about that- and im really starting to think that you are crazy.



Sign Related said:
As for the fact that you even purchased the 1 gun means that now, with it stolen, you're down at having a -1 gun count materialized and on mind (negative effect alright. Or else, you wouldnt even bother reporting it to the cops if it wasnt something counted as a negative). Remember, you cant say to the cops, when they ask whose gun is stolen, that you own no gun or that you own "0" (zero) guns, when in fact, you have the 'proof of purchase' and it was stolen from you. For if that were possible, that you own no gun or that you own 0 (zero) guns, just because it was stolen, you'd be wasting the cops time, now wouldnt you? Or better yet, you'd be lieing to a police officer.

Ha!
Ha? wow you dont sieze to amaze me. if youve purchased 1 gun, then youve given something out of your pocket in exchange. so you are +1 gun and someone steals that gun, you now have 0 guns. if you had -1 that would mean that you owe someone a gun. think of it in dollars...
lets say that you have no money at all- nor do you owe money. so you are at a neutral number somewhere between -1 and 1, which is 0. then somehow you aquire a dollar- and so now you are +1 dollar. and i say 'hey punk gimme your dollar before i break you down like the bitch you are!', and i take your dollar. you now have nothing. which is 0- the absence of value, the point that you started at before you had anything... the point of origin. you wouldn't have -1 dollars, because you are not in debt for that dollar that was taken, you are just back to where you started.
as for your terminator remarks... well they just makes your argument sound like a complete joke, so i wont respond to them.

and o yea i didnt 'cop out'... just because i wasnt online for an ENTIRE 18 hours at a time doesnt mean that im hiding or something.
 
#20
mrmakaveli7 said:
we do use smaller units of time, and decimals/fractions help us with this problem. you wouldn't say that you had the gun for 0 hours. you would say that you bought it and had it for about 30 seconds before someone took it. if you wanted to get technical you could say you had it for .0083 hours. this can also even go into milliseconds or smaller so you wouldnt need decimals but you seem to be attached to hours for some reason. when recording time, you dont ask what hour something occured, you would ask at what time. if you bought it at 4:11 and no minutes elapse- you would say that it got stolen at 4:11 too. i dont see any problem or contradiciton about that- and im really starting to think that you are crazy.




Ha? wow you dont sieze to amaze me. if youve purchased 1 gun, then youve given something out of your pocket in exchange. so you are +1 gun and someone steals that gun, you now have 0 guns. if you had -1 that would mean that you owe someone a gun. think of it in dollars...
lets say that you have no money at all- nor do you owe money. so you are at a neutral number somewhere between -1 and 1, which is 0. then somehow you aquire a dollar- and so now you are +1 dollar. and i say 'hey punk gimme your dollar before i break you down like the bitch you are!', and i take your dollar. you now have nothing. which is 0- the absence of value, the point that you started at before you had anything... the point of origin. you wouldn't have -1 dollars, because you are not in debt for that dollar that was taken, you are just back to where you started.
as for your terminator remarks... well they just makes your argument sound like a complete joke, so i wont respond to them.

and o yea i didnt 'cop out'... just because i wasnt online for an ENTIRE 18 hours at a time doesnt mean that im hiding or something.
If someone stole a one dollar bill from me it's still my one dollar bill! And the fact that some thief got it will in no wise make:

1. the fact change concerning it being my one dollar bill. It's just now a stolen (stolen implies the negative -) one dollar bill of mine.

2. me think (or even imply toward anyone else) I 'have' no stolen one dollar bill, as if, I had a non-existant one dollar bill stolen from me with "0" zero value/worth from the get-go. Nope, that's imaginary. I'd just 'have' a stolen(-) one dollar bill as an actual fact.


I'd be one punk'd negro if someone stole my one dollar bill, and I just act like it has no value from the get-go just because it got stolen unto some theif's hands, and that I dont simply go, "Damn! I've just been robbed of one dollar bill! Somebody call 911!" with some common sense. lol. I mean, there sure wouldnt be a neutral (zero) reaction to something like that, now would their? No, there would indeed be a negative one coming from me in my right mind.

But if you are someone not in your right mind, say, because of a religion that brainwashed you into some 'turn the other cheaK' motto or 'forgive and let go' motto, then you would have what kind of reaction? A neutral (zero) "one" or a possitive "one"? Ha! Now that's a whole nother explaining of the paradox, isnt it, which just goes to reveal the error concerning 0 (zero) in counting in general?


You may have not copped out the first time... but will you now cop a plea bargain, seeing how the facts about the error are stacked against you?

And it aint an 'agree to disagree' plea bargain on the table either since we are dealing with actual facts. The only plea bargain is admit the error so you may receive a reduction in looking dead wrong. :D
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top