U.S. government planting propaganda and misleading stories in the international media

#21
Zero Cool said:
No. Guantanamo Bay is not what I value in American democracy and believe it should be evacuated. When did I ever indicate I supported the institution? However, there is a substantial difference between holding suspected world dangerous terrorists who could commit mass murder at large and a manic dictator who consistently erodes even the most basic human rights amongst his citizens. Your analogy is nonsense.
So u can pick and choose what u like, and disregard that in your analysis, but critisise Castro for it...please!

So you see these people as a threat to your nation and thus it is justified...how is this not the same for Cuba? cause its communist and a dictatorship...grow up!
peace
MX!
 
#24
^
Incase you failed to recognize the title, 'international media' which means - despite Fox being shown in other countries too - that we're really talking about the bullshit the US pushes in the international arena.
 

AmerikazMost

Well-Known Member
#25
CalcuoCuchicheo said:
^
Incase you failed to recognize the title, 'international media' which means - despite Fox being shown in other countries too - that we're really talking about the bullshit the US pushes in the international arena.
You mean like Fox, which used to pump anti-Communist propoganda into China, until the leader made satellite dishes illegal and Fox started losing money. So what did they do? They agreed to start pumping pro-Communist propoganda into the country.

Fox is evil.
 
#27
MX Red said:
So u can pick and choose what u like, and disregard that in your analysis, but critisise Castro for it...please!

So you see these people as a threat to your nation and thus it is justified...how is this not the same for Cuba? cause its communist and a dictatorship...grow up!
peace
MX!
I do not support Guantanamo Bay, I beleive I have made this patently clear. It is indeed a breach of human rights. HOWEVER there is a difference between such a camp set up for the neccessity of stopping mortal threats to the nation and a dictator who abuses his people for his or his parties gain.
 
#28
You said - "As I've said degradation of human rights is degradation of human rights no matter how you try and spin it"

I agree with that statement, It is a moral position that cannot be denied. But when you make such statements and use it as a defence of your country against her enemy - don’t start saying things like "there is a difference" to justify your position when making such a moral statement, your position is contradictory since both sides commit the same crimes, it makes no sense...there are different reasons they commit these crimes, but no moral difference.
You may not agree with what Castro is doing to his people, but he uses basically the same argument but in a different context as your country. It's about perception, not moral positions.
peace
MX!
 
#29
MX Red said:
You said - "As I've said degradation of human rights is degradation of human rights no matter how you try and spin it"

I agree with that statement, It is a moral position that cannot be denied. But when you make such statements and use it as a defence of your country against her enemy - don’t start saying things like "there is a difference" to justify your position when making such a moral statement, your position is contradictory since both sides commit the same crimes, it makes no sense...there are different reasons they commit these crimes, but no moral difference.
You may not agree with what Castro is doing to his people, but he uses basically the same argument but in a different context as your country. It's about perception, not moral positions.
peace
MX!
Firstly, I not American.

Secondly, as I've stated Guantanamo Bay is wrong but we're not talking about Guantanamo Bay we're talking about Castro. Castro is a dictator who brutalizes his own people. The U.S. base at Guantanamo is a degredation of human rights but to try and somehow equate the two and say they are the same is simply nonsensical.
 
#30
Zero Cool said:
Firstly, I not American.
Sorry, shouldnt have assumed you were American.

Zero Cool said:
Secondly, as I've stated Guantanamo Bay is wrong but we're not talking about Guantanamo Bay we're talking about Castro. Castro is a dictator who brutalizes his own people. The U.S. base at Guantanamo is a degredation of human rights but to try and somehow equate the two and say they are the same is simply nonsensical.
Yeah but this is what I'm saying, that is your opinion, the abuse of human rights were talking about aren’t morally wrong because they are against the law, the things were talking about have an intrinsic worth, it’s like murder or rape, it feels wrong. So don't make moral comparisons between them to demonise Castro, America is doing the same thing. I don't think its non-sensical to equate the two on this issue from a political perspective, since that is the only perspective we can use - They are pretty much using the same tactics, you make think one is a hell of a lot more justafiable than the other, that is your opinion. But, it is not nonsensencial "to try and somehow equate the two", there is a logic to it like it or not.
peace
MX!
 
#32
Zero Cool said:
I do not support Guantanamo Bay, I beleive I have made this patently clear. It is indeed a breach of human rights. HOWEVER there is a difference between such a camp set up for the neccessity of stopping mortal threats to the nation and a dictator who abuses his people for his or his parties gain.
So taking your standpoint, if it is a "Mortal Threat" to your nation, it is ok to setup a camp and take whatever action is necessary? I see you side with the 'terrorist' mindset then? I know Osama Bin Laden has said similar things in the not so distant past.

Do see the US government as abusing their people for their own gains? The Patriot act? The war in Iraq (putting soldiers at risk to further your parties financial gains)? You are lost my friend.

Capitalism is definitely a threat to communism. For communism to work effectively, the people must believe in true equality. Once you start flaunting to people the'riches' and the belief that things can be better, you then move from believing in 'equality' to profit over people. Likewise communism is a threat to capitalism in that those that are in power (the rich upper class), do not want to lose what they have in belongings, therefore they will do the best they can to keep the idea of a true 'government of the people' out of people's minds.

Have you ever taken a step back and realized the type of people that are making the laws that you and I have to abide by? Have you ever stopped and thought about the war in Iraq and who's benefitting most out of it (aside from the Iraqis...haliburton perhaps?)?

I do believe Castro put the interests of Cuba before himself, what other president (or dictator) have you seen fight in a revolution or war himself and risk his own life for the people? Certainly not the mighty president of the United States.

Che Guevara was the true definition of a Communist to me. I do not think Castro had nor has the same intentions that Che Guevara had.

I know you say communism is dead, is it really? As the gap of upper and lower class widens, you bet we will be closer to a revolution than before. Read about Hugo Chavez if you believe communism to be dead..it seems to be starting in Venezuela as we speak, and unless the US government tries to oppress the people of venezuela more by possibly stopping this belief of equality, venezuela will become the next socialist/communist country.
 

Rahim

VIP Member
Staff member
#36
Not a big surprise to me at all! We've all talked about this before, and even seen stuff like this in movies. If this is what's really going on, then it can only get worse.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top