who did smackdown draft?
First of all it makes sense for the show Raw to have two champs because smackdown seems less important and no one is really tuning in to see the world title picture over there. Second of all, John Cena can't be seen as important because he's not as over and shouldn't be. IMO, he's not main event material and the main title on the show should be the wwe title. The WWE title could be for former guys that were once champs that are on RAW such as Kane, HBK, Jericho, Angle and maybe even Flair. And if so if the WWE title is taken as 2nd class, then JBL and Guerrero wont be seen as TRUE champion material because most of the guys that held the title on smackdown besides Lesnar and maybe Angle can't really draw any money or sell out arenas. IMO THATS GOOD!! And its obvious that THE WORLD TITLE has always been more important out of the two. So now that the WWE title is on the show it shouldn't matter about which title is more important.
WORLD TITLE HAS MORE HISTORY ANYWAY THAN THE WWE TITLE!!
Yeah and why cant you have 3rd rate performers fighting for the third best belt. Who made that rule? There'll always be a couple or few top performers/former main eventers on SD, so they'll add importance to the title belt scene over there. If anything, I see that as good because guys who come from nowhere and win belts like Cena won't be taken as a main eventer too soon and the WWE has too many former main eventers. Once you get the smackdown title, they'll move over to Raw, fight for the WWE title, and then fight for the biggest prize title, which is the WORLD'S TITLE.!!
Illuminattile said:
WWE already has a development territory. Most people won't tune in to Smackdown just to see jobbers.
Well if the rosters were more balanced it wouldn't be a problem. As it stands, as soon as someone gets over enough, they get drafted to feud with HHH, the "real" World Champion.
You always need to create new stars. You need to keep it fresh at the top of the card, so you don't get repetitive. Plus, I can't see HBK, Flair, 'Taker, Big Show or Kane getting a title run any time soon, unless it's a "one last run" kinda thing.
It might be smart in the short term, but once Smackdown gets a new timeslot on a new station, you can't have a bunch of second-rate performers fighting over the third most prestigious belt in the company.
Having two major titles on one show isn't an option. HHH's belt is obviously the more important of the two, since he's main eventing Vengeance in a HIAC, while Cena is wrestling on the undercard. You can't have two World Champions on one show, it doesn't work in the long run. It totally negates the whole idea of the champion being the best in the brand/company/world. Cena will suffer because his belt is not the best belt on the show anymore. If both belts stay on RAW, they'll get merged. Otherwise, one of the champions (likely Batista, Y2J or Christian) will jump to Smackdown and they'll either not bother with a new belt or they'll merge those two belts.
Well if the rosters were more balanced it wouldn't be a problem. As it stands, as soon as someone gets over enough, they get drafted to feud with HHH, the "real" World Champion.
You always need to create new stars. You need to keep it fresh at the top of the card, so you don't get repetitive. Plus, I can't see HBK, Flair, 'Taker, Big Show or Kane getting a title run any time soon, unless it's a "one last run" kinda thing.
It might be smart in the short term, but once Smackdown gets a new timeslot on a new station, you can't have a bunch of second-rate performers fighting over the third most prestigious belt in the company.
Having two major titles on one show isn't an option. HHH's belt is obviously the more important of the two, since he's main eventing Vengeance in a HIAC, while Cena is wrestling on the undercard. You can't have two World Champions on one show, it doesn't work in the long run. It totally negates the whole idea of the champion being the best in the brand/company/world. Cena will suffer because his belt is not the best belt on the show anymore. If both belts stay on RAW, they'll get merged. Otherwise, one of the champions (likely Batista, Y2J or Christian) will jump to Smackdown and they'll either not bother with a new belt or they'll merge those two belts.
First of all it makes sense for the show Raw to have two champs because smackdown seems less important and no one is really tuning in to see the world title picture over there. Second of all, John Cena can't be seen as important because he's not as over and shouldn't be. IMO, he's not main event material and the main title on the show should be the wwe title. The WWE title could be for former guys that were once champs that are on RAW such as Kane, HBK, Jericho, Angle and maybe even Flair. And if so if the WWE title is taken as 2nd class, then JBL and Guerrero wont be seen as TRUE champion material because most of the guys that held the title on smackdown besides Lesnar and maybe Angle can't really draw any money or sell out arenas. IMO THATS GOOD!! And its obvious that THE WORLD TITLE has always been more important out of the two. So now that the WWE title is on the show it shouldn't matter about which title is more important.
WORLD TITLE HAS MORE HISTORY ANYWAY THAN THE WWE TITLE!!
Yeah and why cant you have 3rd rate performers fighting for the third best belt. Who made that rule? There'll always be a couple or few top performers/former main eventers on SD, so they'll add importance to the title belt scene over there. If anything, I see that as good because guys who come from nowhere and win belts like Cena won't be taken as a main eventer too soon and the WWE has too many former main eventers. Once you get the smackdown title, they'll move over to Raw, fight for the WWE title, and then fight for the biggest prize title, which is the WORLD'S TITLE.!!