Scientists find T-Rex soft tissue

#21
Jokerman said:
Because dinosaurs died out 65 million years before the Bible was written.
That makes no sense, For the Bible goes to the very beginning of creation. God created Adam, Eve, Kaa the snake, Baloo, Bagheera and all of their tight crew... etc. But no Dinosaurs.

If what you say is true, and from where you're coming from, it sounds like as to say that the existence of Dinosaur remains/fossils disproves the existence of God. No?
 

Jokerman

Well-Known Member
#22
Yeshua said:
it sounds like as to say that the existence of Dinosaur remains/fossils disproves the existence of God. No?
No. It just means the Bible was written by people living 65 million years after dinousaurs died out.

By the way, I've found God's bones. And soft tissue. The cloning has begun.
 
#24
Jokerman said:
No. It just means the Bible was written by people living 65 million years after dinousaurs died out.

...and they just decided to leave T-Rex out of the Bible?

Sorry if this is a little off topic.

I don't think we should be messing with mother nature, cloning Dinosaurs and the likes. Although I wouldn't mind a Triceratops guarding my house.
 
#25
Yeshua said:
...and they just decided to leave T-Rex out of the Bible?

Sorry if this is a little off topic.

I don't think we should be messing with mother nature, cloning Dinosaurs and the likes. Although I wouldn't mind a Triceratops guarding my house.
so the house that you live the city that you live in is not messing with mother nature?
 
#26
one mc on dj said:
so the house that you live the city that you live in is not messing with mother nature?
Changing the Geographical Environment is a little more serious than messing with Genetics (imo), and I don't think the Church would be too happy either.
 

Shahin

Active Member
#27
Yeshua said:
If what you say is true, and from where you're coming from, it sounds like as to say that the existence of Dinosaur remains/fossils disproves the existence of God. No?
Some people say that when the Bible is referring to behemoths and levithians (or something like that) they're talking about dinosaurs.
 

Glockmatic

Well-Known Member
#28
I don't think we should be messing with mother nature, cloning Dinosaurs and the likes. Although I wouldn't mind a Triceratops guarding my house.
we're already messing with mother nature, medicine we take, surgeries, vaccines etc. If we didn't mess with nature most of us would be dead
 

TecK NeeX

On Probation: Please report break in guidelines to
#29
Shahin said:
Some people say that when the Bible is referring to behemoths and levithians (or something like that) they're talking about dinosaurs.
but these idiots we're talking about (some found in this thread) want the actual "dinosaur" word found in scriptures, if the word dinosaurs is not found they reject everything else believed to be talking about these prehistoric creatures. its either dinosuars or nothing
 

Glockmatic

Well-Known Member
#31
saw an interview with the paleontologist that found the bone/tissue, he said that theres 0.0001% of cloning a t-rex because there just isn't enough DNA there since its over 70 million years old, DNA has a lifespan of about 100,000 years. Also they would need live cells in order to clone, they can't do anything with DNA
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top