Oh Shit World War Three Is About To Start

#1
"North Korea on Thursday announced for the first time that it has nuclear weapons and rejected moves to restart disarmament talks any time soon, saying it needs the weapons as protection against an increasingly hostile United States."

North Korea will stay away from talks on its nuclear programme for an "indefinite period", according to the nation's foreign ministry.
Pyongyang said there was no point in the talks since the US had termed North Korea an "outpost of tyranny".

The North also repeated a claim to have built nuclear weapons for self-defence.

But US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the communist state would only deepen its international isolation if it pulled out of the talks.

"The world has given them a way out and we hope they will take that way out," she said at a news conference with European Union leaders.

Washington and Pyongyang have been locked in a diplomatic standoff since October 2002, when the US accused North Korea of operating an illegal uranium programme.

Since then three rounds of talks have been held - including China, Japan, Russia and South Korea - but little progress has been made.

The North Korean foreign ministry's statement, which was reported by state news agency KCNA, said: "We have wanted the six-party talks but we are compelled to suspend our participation... for an indefinite period".

There is no justification for us to participate in the six-party talks again, given that the Bush administration termed [us] an 'outpost of tyranny'
---------
North Korean statement in full:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4252515.stm
---------

It added that Pyongyang had "manufactured nukes for self-defence" and would take "a measure to bolster its nuclear weapons arsenal" in order to "protect its ideology, system, freedom and democracy".

This is North Korea's most explicit public assertion that it possesses nuclear weapons. Senior members of the regime have privately spoken about its nuclear capability on several occasions in the past.

US and other intelligence agencies believe the North could already have built a small number of weapons, variously estimated at between two and ten.

US 'antagonism'

North Korea's anger appears to be directed at several keynote speeches made by US President George Bush and other senior members of his administration as they started their new terms in office.

"The second-term Bush administration's intention to antagonise the DPRK (North Korea) and isolate and stifle it at any cost has become quite clear," the statement said, citing the president's inaugural address and his State of the Union speech.

Condoleezza Rice's description of the isolated nation as an "outpost of tyranny" was also singled out for criticism.

US RHETORIC ON NORTH
19 Jan: Condoleezza Rice refers to North as an "outpost of tyranny"
20 Jan: No mention in George Bush's inauguration speech, though US goal was to "end tyranny in our world"
2 Feb: Mr Bush's State of the Union address says US working with governments in Asia to convince North Korea to abandon nuclear ambitions


'Outposts of tyranny'

"There is no justification for us to participate in the six-party talks again, given that the Bush administration termed the DPRK, a dialogue partner, an 'outpost of tyranny'," the statement said.

Some observers had hoped that Mr Bush's State of the Union speech would actually increase the chance of the stalled nuclear talks going ahead, because the president refrained from direct criticism of North Korea.

In a past speech, in 2002, he famously described Iraq, Iran and North Korea as part of an "axis of evil".

In Thursday's statement, Pyongyang also had strong words to say about Japan, which it described as "persistently pursuing its hostile policy toward the DPRK, toeing the US line".

It accused Tokyo of trying to prevent normalised relations by making false claims over the "abduction issue" - an ongoing row about missing Japanese nationals which North Korea admits to having kidnapped in the 1970s and 80s.

Pyongyang claims the issue has now been "settled".

Just hours before North Korea's statement was released, John Bolton, the US undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, said that Washington believed Pyongyang was still continuing to produce nuclear weapons.

"To whatever extent the North Koreans are proceeding with their programme, and we believe they are, the absence of progress in six-party talks means they are making further progress toward their increased capability," Mr Bolton told reporters during a visit to Tokyo.

"Time is not on our side," he added.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4252481.stm

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20050210/ap_on_re_as/nkorea_nuclear
 
#3
I support North Korea's aims to protect itself from a blatantly hostile US.

Furthermore, I suggest if Bush wants to end tyranny he checks himself before trying to check others.
 
#4
North Korea is an extremely dangerous country.

I suggest everyone read the country profile, so you are equipped with the facts and know what you are dealing with.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/country_profiles/1131421.stm

"The totalitarian state also stands accused of systematic human rights abuses. Reports of torture, public executions, slave labour, and forced abortions and infanticides in prison camps have emerged. A US-based rights group has estimated that there are up to 200,000 political prisoners in North Korea."
 
#5
the united states was built on the labor of Africans who were stolen from there home and made to work for nothing. How can a country have a good long term prognosis with a foundation so appauling?
It cant.
The universe has a way of balancing and correcting itself however.
"The last shall be first, the first shall be last"
 
#7
J Chapman said:
They wernt stolen, they were sold, by other Africans.
if it was against there will, it was stolen.
Even if the original slaves were once slaves of Africans who indeed sold them to 'interested buyers', that doesnt account for the some millions of others that were 'stolen'
 
#8
CalcuoCuchicheo said:
I support North Korea's aims to protect itself from a blatantly hostile US.
Rather than engage in petty anti-U.S propaganda, examine the true facts of the situation.

J Chapman said:
North Korea is an extremely dangerous country.

I suggest everyone read the country profile, so you are equipped with the facts and know what you are dealing with.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/country_profiles/1131421.stm

"The totalitarian state also stands accused of systematic human rights abuses. Reports of torture, public executions, slave labour, and forced abortions and infanticides in prison camps have emerged. A US-based rights group has estimated that there are up to 200,000 political prisoners in North Korea."
 
#9
J Chapman said:
North Korea is an extremely dangerous country.

I suggest everyone read the country profile, so you are equipped with the facts and know what you are dealing with.
I don't think anyone is as dangerous as the USA. North Korea hasn't been invading countries left right and centre, the USA has, so whos more dangerous, obviously America. Also Americas Human Rights records are'nt the best, You ever heard of Guantanamo Bay or did you forget that.
 
#10
imcominharder said:
if it was against there will, it was stolen.
Even if the original slaves were once slaves of Africans who indeed sold them to 'interested buyers', that doesnt account for the some millions of others that were 'stolen'
If you like Africans so much (I'm not saying I don't) then how do you feel about the Africans who still buy, sell and trade them in their own country?
 
#15
Zero Cool said:
Rather than engage in petty anti-U.S propaganda, examine the true facts of the situation.
Rather than swallowing everything the Americans say, why don't you examine the situation & see that America is the aggressor & every country has the right to defend themselves. America has no right to tell North Korea what to do.

If there is anti-US in the truth, then the truth must show America in a bad light.

I stand by my support for North Korea to defend itself. Usually I would say every country should do their best to cooperate with the UN & other organisations of the like, but as America doesn't play by the rules, why should North Korea?
 

Butt Rubber

More arrogant than SicC
#16
CalcuoCuchicheo said:
Rather than swallowing everything the Americans say, why don't you examine the situation & see that America is the aggressor & every country has the right to defend themselves. America has no right to tell North Korea what to do.

If there is anti-US in the truth, then the truth must show America in a bad light.

I stand by my support for North Korea to defend itself. Usually I would say every country should do their best to cooperate with the UN & other organisations of the like, but as America doesn't play by the rules, why should North Korea?
all I'm going to bother saying is thank god your not the president of the US or else we'd be blown to bits by now
 
#17
Bank Robber said:
all I'm going to bother saying is thank god your not the president of the US or else we'd be blown to bits by now
Nah, if I were President of the US, I would attempt to eradicate the problems on US soil before I meddled elsewhere thus reducing the anti-US feelings of much of the world.

I would recognize UN guidelines & do my best to ensure the media retained free speech & that the Geneva Convetion was not breached by my soldiers amongst other things.

Bank Robber, tell me why you think America would be blown to bits if I were President?
 
#18
america's the reason why north korea is fukked up- they cut electricity- they came with the war, split korea in 2... its only logical that N-Korea hates the US
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top