Nuclear weapons

[PuffnScruff]

So which is the only country to ever actually use a weapon of mass destruction? Oh wait, the US!!!.
.

lol, i think it is obvious you are refering to an nuclear weapon, but you do know what falls under the catagory of a WMD don't you? grenades, rockets, missiles, mines, any device that explodes that has a charge of more than four ounces and the list goes on. clearly the US isn't the only country to ever use one. lol shit, i have concealed carry deadly weaponds license and by law i can legally carry a wmd on me into a resturaunt

 

[AmerikazMost]

Wow thats all fantastic, debatable, but I wont for the sake of getting some sleep so I will say, yep, wow, fantastic, I have government envy now... Ermm... So which is the only country to ever actually use a weapon of mass destruction? Oh wait, the US!!!... Like I said... Yeah, cause the US is soooo stable.

(By stable I did not mean sustainable).



I doubt theres much you can do unless you can change the climate for the farmlands, and as for race riots, we had one minor FIGHT between what is basically two rival communities/crews that compared to real RIOTS the US has had seems like a school yard brawl.

Please, when you vote, dont worry about helping Australia, help yourselves first.

Umm, using those nuclear weapons probably saved more lives than they ended on both sides considering there was no end in sight. I'm not trying to support the mass devastation to innocent life or the country that it caused, but it was not an unstable decision.

Stable doesn't mean sustainable, but sustainability can be a measure of stability. Whether or not the country uses a nuclear weapon is not (what for and why they use it may be). I would consider calling for the destruction of biologically inferior peoples a little loony. I'd consider calling for an entire state to be wiped off the map a little cuckoo. I'd consider letting a long, bloody war that would decimate both sides to drag out to be a little insane.