Not to beat a Dead horse but.....
- Thread starter Hankaveli
- Start date
you have to admit there are a hella alot of irregularities esp with the pentagon. attach that to the reports of bombs under neath the planes the trade centre (not saying its true but still worth looking at) and countless other things including the bush knew of a planned attack a fucking MONTH BEFORE
Cnn report's no plane hit pentagon
http://infowars.com/articles/sept11/cnn_report_no_plane_pentagon.htm
ok i just read harrypotter's post with the same story ....my bad
from the title i didnt know so.....
http://infowars.com/articles/sept11/cnn_report_no_plane_pentagon.htm
ok i just read harrypotter's post with the same story ....my bad
from the title i didnt know so.....
If anyone thinks this is a CNN report saying "No plane hit the Pentagon," then no wonder you're confused about everything.
This is merely a reporter's impressions of the crash site and of only seeing small pieces of the plane. (As opposed to all the other times planes hit the Pentagon and there were big pieces left, right?) It's already been established there were no big pieces left. So what's new here? When a plane hits something at that speed with that amount of fuel, there will be no big pieces left. In fact, if there had been big pieces left, I'd be the first to cry "fake!" So... this is further proof there's no conspiracy. Thanks for the link. :thumb:
This is merely a reporter's impressions of the crash site and of only seeing small pieces of the plane. (As opposed to all the other times planes hit the Pentagon and there were big pieces left, right?) It's already been established there were no big pieces left. So what's new here? When a plane hits something at that speed with that amount of fuel, there will be no big pieces left. In fact, if there had been big pieces left, I'd be the first to cry "fake!" So... this is further proof there's no conspiracy. Thanks for the link. :thumb:
get over it
100,000+ innocent iraqis have died from your bombs when they had nothing to do with 911, and all there is to show those innocent killed is 1 big fucking mess
that seems just a little more tragic
he said it was strange because what happened that day was very fucking strange
well at least for those who look into the evidence
This is not about Conspiracy Theories. This is about documenting and analyzing evidence to determine what happened. Yes there is a Conspiracy to hide the truths about September 11th, it is not a theory though. Keep an open mind
Picture 1: The world was shown this destroyed part of the Pentagon
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos/Pentagon1.jpg
Picture 2: Immediately after the impact. Where are the remnants of the plane?
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos/Pentagon2.jpg
Picture 3: The front of the Pentagon within minutes of the attack.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos/Pentagon3.jpg
The building is still intact and there is no plane debris to be seen.
Half an hour after the attack , around 10.10 hours, the external wall caved in.
Picture 4: Point of impact, enlarged.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos/Pentagon4.jpg
Picture 5: The exit hole
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos/Pentagon5.jpg
Picture 6: After removal of debris
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos/Pentagon6.jpg
Picture 7: The two arrows, white exit hole, and black impact hole, indicate different
flight paths of object that hit the Pentagon outer ring.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos/Pentagon7.jpg
Picture 8: Flight path of object that penetrated all three building rings, arrow pointing to exit hole.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos/Pentagon8.jpg
Picture 9: The exit hole.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos/Pentagon9.jpg
Picture 10: Another perspective of exit hole, lower right.
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/images/photos/Pentagon10.jpg
The plane that hit was only 12 ft, 4 inches in width. That would create a 13 ft cylindrical hole. The hole in the Pentagon is 15-20 feet, according to conspiracy sites. (My God... you're right! It couldn't have been hit by a 757! It must have been hit by a bigger plane, like a 747.)
Given the size of the 757, and the size of the Pentagon, the damaged area fits in pefectly with the dimensions of both the aircraft and the building. The wings simply shredded like a tin can, as would be expected.
Given the size of the 757, and the size of the Pentagon, the damaged area fits in pefectly with the dimensions of both the aircraft and the building. The wings simply shredded like a tin can, as would be expected.
This fact has already been established. Flight 11 first circled D.C. as if it couldn't find an original target or missed it, and then honed in on the Pentagon.
The plane actually touched ground before hitting the Pentagon if I remember correctly. Either way it's been established that the plane was flying at nearly ground level when it zeroed in.
The plane actually touched ground before hitting the Pentagon if I remember correctly. Either way it's been established that the plane was flying at nearly ground level when it zeroed in.
Easier said than done. 9/11 upheaved and changed the entire geopolitical and not to meantion social consciousness of the international realm.
International politics will never be the same. History was made right before our eyes and because of that, people's perspective on the world was drastically brought to the forefront of their minds.
So to say, "just get over it" is blatantly disrespectful to the many people who's lives were lost in the US as well as those who have been harmed by the subsequent war on terror and war on Iraq.
Such a life changing event is likely to generate interest and speculation as to the cause and "actuality" of the event, which may not coincide with the explanations we have been given. If people want to question Sept 11, I feel they have every right, but if you find the topic boring, there are plenty of other forums to view.
International politics will never be the same. History was made right before our eyes and because of that, people's perspective on the world was drastically brought to the forefront of their minds.
So to say, "just get over it" is blatantly disrespectful to the many people who's lives were lost in the US as well as those who have been harmed by the subsequent war on terror and war on Iraq.
Such a life changing event is likely to generate interest and speculation as to the cause and "actuality" of the event, which may not coincide with the explanations we have been given. If people want to question Sept 11, I feel they have every right, but if you find the topic boring, there are plenty of other forums to view.
Not at all, it's just I learned that complaining wont get you nowhere.
Plus, they killed 13 000 people when they first entered Iraq, 9/11 losses quadrapled.we dont go boasting about everytime we get the chance, or which type of aircrafts they used, what speed they were flying, which angle they hit, how many bricks fell, etc.It's old news, there's too much going on in the present that I dont think sticking to what happened 4 years ago would change shit.
Plus, they killed 13 000 people when they first entered Iraq, 9/11 losses quadrapled.we dont go boasting about everytime we get the chance, or which type of aircrafts they used, what speed they were flying, which angle they hit, how many bricks fell, etc.It's old news, there's too much going on in the present that I dont think sticking to what happened 4 years ago would change shit.
I think the purpose of this thread, however, is to learn the truth about Sept 11 - how can we guage and understand the present without a true appreciation of the past, and indeed, without knowing the truth behind the events which started the chain of war??
And as for the deaths in Iraq, like I said before, it is all related in the sense that Sept 11 led to a more aggressive and militarily determined US.... to understand the present war, you have to understand the past. The justifications for war are weakened (although they always were weak imo) and the subsequent losses become all the more horific if the events that led to policy shift did not occur as we have been told.
Besides, I do not see complaining, I see questioning. Speculation. An attempt to set right what may be misconceived notions of external threats and unnecessary chain of events.
And as for the deaths in Iraq, like I said before, it is all related in the sense that Sept 11 led to a more aggressive and militarily determined US.... to understand the present war, you have to understand the past. The justifications for war are weakened (although they always were weak imo) and the subsequent losses become all the more horific if the events that led to policy shift did not occur as we have been told.
Besides, I do not see complaining, I see questioning. Speculation. An attempt to set right what may be misconceived notions of external threats and unnecessary chain of events.
That right there is the crux of my interests, the reporter said the same thing that the building collapsed a short time after what I will call "Event" happend.
so A huge plane nose dives into the pentagon burts into billions of tiny pieces without causeing initial structure damage?
what a wacko I am to question if a plane hit that building or not.
so A huge plane nose dives into the pentagon burts into billions of tiny pieces without causeing initial structure damage?
what a wacko I am to question if a plane hit that building or not.
Donate
Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.
Members online
No members online now.