London Bombs where "Military Explosives" **Sigh**

#22
Mr Matt said:
No they weren't, it's turns they were of Pakistani heritage. My point is, I'm tired of the stereotype that all Arabs are terrorists, I'm suprised you perpetuate it yourself if you are an Arab, even if they were Arabs it's makes no difference to the situation, nobody called the Bali bombers "extremist Indonesians".

If what you mean is "Islamic extremists", then again that's a total misconception, these guys don't represent any religion on any level, I thought that most people realised they just use religion as an excuse to do whatever they want to do and try to divide people to side against each religion.

Just call them terrorists cuz that's all they are.

Peace.
lets all sing together holding hands, caucasians and arabs... we are the world, we are the children
 
#23
What cracks me up about the whole situation is that as soon as this happened, folks in the UK were like "USA this" and "America that" and "George Bush this" and it kept going and going and going...........
The terrorist were BRITISH. What's my point? Instead of everyone pointing fingers when things first happen, why not get the facts first and then take action?
 
#24
This worlds' gone way past the every1 holding hands stage. By the way, the bombers weren't arab. They did it under the name of Islam - which is also wrong, coz Islam doesn't promote this kind of behaviour.
 

Helena

Active Member
#25
I dont think the bombers set out 2 kill themselves, apparently they kept their identification on them and suicide bombers usually strip themselves of all identification. plus 2 of the bombers' wives are pregnant therefore it seems unlikely they would want to die. here's what i think, and many ppl are thinking this too. maybe they were told that the bombs had a timer on them, and that they would have a chance to escape after detonating the bombs but were tricked and the bombs exploded straight away? anyway, it was sum fucked up shit that happened. i hope they burn in hell.
Oh and one more thing, Tony Blair has said that these bombings had nothing to do with Iraq. Bullshit. they had everything to do with Iraq why else did they do it. but still, two wrongs dont make a right.
 

The.Menace

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#26
Tone Capone said:
What cracks me up about the whole situation is that as soon as this happened, folks in the UK were like "USA this" and "America that" and "George Bush this" and it kept going and going and going...........
The terrorist were BRITISH. What's my point? Instead of everyone pointing fingers when things first happen, why not get the facts first and then take action?
I never heard someone say the US blew up the stations so what's the FUCKING POINT?
 
#27
Tony Blair has said that these bombings had nothing to do with Iraq. Bullshit. they had everything to do with Iraq why else did they do it.
How did they have anything to do with Iraq? If you've followed their story at all, the suspects were perfectly normal well into the Iraq war before taking a trip to Pakistan and returning as extremely "devout" Muslims.

These were British citizens attacking their own country after taking a trip to Pakistan and becoming more radical. Clearly Iraq is not the entire answer.

OF course! wtf are you talking about? of the millions that take these trains, they were the only ones carrying back packs!
Suicide bombers are identified by their injuries. The hallmark is usually decapitation. From there, the British worked backwards into checking out the individuals' pasts.

And getting back to the point of this thread, it has since come out that the explosives were not "military explosives." The official who said that simply jumped the gun.
 

Helena

Active Member
#28
Morris said:
How did they have anything to do with Iraq? If you've followed their story at all, the suspects were perfectly normal well into the Iraq war before taking a trip to Pakistan and returning as extremely "devout" Muslims.


Wat do you mean the suspects were perfectly normal well into the Iraq war?
 

TecK NeeX

On Probation: Please report break in guidelines to
#29
Morris said:
How did they have anything to do with Iraq? If you've followed their story at all, the suspects were perfectly normal well into the Iraq war before taking a trip to Pakistan and returning as extremely "devout" Muslims.

These were British citizens attacking their own country after taking a trip to Pakistan and becoming more radical. Clearly Iraq is not the entire answer.


England - Shahzad Tanweer, the 22-year-old son of a Pakistani-born affluent businessman, turned to Islam, the religion of his birth, a few years ago. The transformation was gradual, but then his relentless reading of the Quran and daily prayers became almost an obsession, his friends told The Associated Press. He became withdrawn and increasingly angry over the war in Iraq, according to those who knew him best.

The U.S.-led war was what likely drove him to blow himself up on a subway train last week, said his friends
Im pretty sure the same can be said about the other bombers, if thats what they really were

Suicide bombers are identified by their injuries. The hallmark is usually decapitation. From there, the British worked backwards into checking out the individuals' pasts. .
Their past shows anything but being potential suicide bombers, plus the bombers believed to have placed the bombs in one place and sat at another. Injuries sustained is irrelevant. there is no evidence!
 
#30
Their past shows anything but being potential suicide bombers, plus the bombers believed to have placed the bombs in one place and sat at another. Injuries sustained is irrelevant. there is no evidence!
In at least one of the cases, the British identified one of the suspects as a suicide bomber based on his sustained injuries.

Also, at least 2 of them took a trip to Pakistan after the war had started and came back much more religious than before.

And what exactly was going on in early July that would be the straw that broke the camel's back as far as Iraq was concerned? If these guys were simply blowing themselves up based on Iraq, why not after Abu Ghraib or Fallujah or any of the other bad stories?
 

TecK NeeX

On Probation: Please report break in guidelines to
#31
Morris said:
In at least one of the cases, the British identified one of the suspects as a suicide bomber based on his sustained injuries.
The 'suicide bombers' and people closest to them would have sustained the same injuries

Also, at least 2 of them took a trip to Pakistan after the war had started and came back much more religious than before.
why are you being such an ignorant bastard about this? Just because they took a trip to pakistan and became more religious that automaticaly makes them suicide bombers? the millions of muslims who make their pilgrimage to mecca each year to become more religious should be according to you labeled as potential bombers and a threat to society?

And what exactly was going on in early July that would be the straw that broke the camel's back as far as Iraq was concerned? If these guys were simply blowing themselves up based on Iraq, why not after Abu Ghraib or Fallujah or any of the other bad stories?
If they were responsible for the attacks im pretty sure they planned this mission carefully, and since time was on their side it could have very well taken them months perhaps years to plan and give the ok to go ahead with these well co-ordinated attacks. Do you really think muslims are less angry now about Abu Ghraib and the bombings of Fallujah than they were when these war crimes actually happened?
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top