"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.(Lies)
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998. (Lying Democrat.)
Keep in mind, most of these statements were the belief before Bush's bad intelligence.
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
--Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998 (Lying Democrats)
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
--Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998. (Lying Democrat)
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999. (liar)
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
--Letter to President Bush, Signed by Joe Lieberman (D-CT), John McCain (Rino-AZ) and others, Dec. 5, 2001. (Liars)
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
--Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.(Liar)
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
--Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002. (Drunken liar.)
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
--Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002. (lies)
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
--Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002. (bastard)
"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his contin ued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003. (Make him President.)
Before the war, everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, thought that Saddam had WMD. The UN, Germany, France, all of them. Even Hussein thought he had them, and he acted like he did. Maybe his scientists lied to him. But he wanted the world to know that he had them. And he did have WMD. Ask the Kurds. It's not like this whole idea of Saddam having WMD was just made up out of the blue.
The U.N. view, published on March 6, 2003, was not only that Iraq still had anthrax, the inspectors increased their estimate for the volume of unaccounted anthrax from 8,500 litres to 10,000 litres. As Iraq could produce little evidence of either production or destruction, Blix's team concluded that: "Based on all the available evidence, the strong presumption is that about 10,000 litres of anthrax was not destroyed and may still exist." This view was not based on any intelligence supplied by Bush & Co.
Let's see, you give Saddam two years notice that you're coming in, and he's surrounded by countries sympathetic to him. You don't suppose any WMD's were moved to Syria or Iran?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.................They wouldn't do that!!!!!!!! Would they????????
Some people have listened to the lies of the left-wing, socialist, limp-wristed liberal press for so long that their blatant nonsense has become truth to them.
If you believe that someone poses a threat, and he acts like he is armed, and everyone around him says that he has a gun, HE says he has a gun, and he's had guns in the past, and he's harming everyone around him, you are going to eventually have to go in and disarm him. Now whether he was bluffing about his weapon or not, you have reasonable suspicion and fear for your life and the safety of those around him. He caused you and the others to believe that he had the weapon and now you act on it. Why? Because you can.
) to put a monkey on the top - and your country can do whatever it wants, go to war without reasons launch missles whatever - cause the new first man didn't know better there would be no guilt right?
