ken said:
^^no , 2pax used the reasoning that "the bible is simply there to haze and control the gullibe" yet 2pax hasn't reached that conclusion via his own thinking. So he also has been influenced. like, he says, someone reading the bible has been influenced. What makes his source more credible than the bible. Although, I know, there are many flaws in the bible, there are flaws in asserting that "the bible is there to control the gullible". Because, ultimately, it can't be proved that God doesn't exist. And also it is accepted nowadays that the bible has been changed and is not the same as it was originally written.