What I find intriguing is that, even after all these years of debating about it, Teck NeeX still seems to have no clue about some of the basic "traits" of evolution.
Although then again, I'm not so surprised by that when I realize that his actual reasoning and debating skills (meaning, correctly connecting arguments and counter-arguments together and drawing conclusions) are seriously below par. Like Chronic said, proving (or trying to prove) something isn't red doesn't make it blue.
Teck takes "thingy" A and "thingy" B, connects them and he gets conclusions I. Conveniently forgetting about thingies C through M and conclusions II, III and IV, which you also need to take into account to be scientifically and philosophically correct.
Although then again, I'm not so surprised by that when I realize that his actual reasoning and debating skills (meaning, correctly connecting arguments and counter-arguments together and drawing conclusions) are seriously below par. Like Chronic said, proving (or trying to prove) something isn't red doesn't make it blue.
Teck takes "thingy" A and "thingy" B, connects them and he gets conclusions I. Conveniently forgetting about thingies C through M and conclusions II, III and IV, which you also need to take into account to be scientifically and philosophically correct.