Black History Article by Yours Truly

#1
We’ve all heard of the Civil Rights Movement at one point or another during our academic careers. We’ve all been exposed to the nonviolent tactics stressed by Martin Luther King, Jr., as well as the “By any means necessary” approach used by Malcolm X. We’ve heard of the Black Panthers and their separatist beliefs. However, either consciously or not, we only tend to affiliate Black History Month with the aforementioned leaders and occasionally with the Panthers. We don’t normally acknowledge the Harlem Renaissance, or the works of W.E.B. Dubois and Booker T. Washington, among many other important things. Black History Month is about Black history – all African-American history that this nation has witnessed, willingly or not.



Now don’t get me wrong: what MLK Jr. and his recently deceased wife, Coretta Scott King, did for our entire nation will never be forgotten. Their impact on our society is unable to be forgotten. But other nonviolence advocates like John Lewis, Diane Nash, and James Bevel – all founding members of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, which took up campaigns like the Freedom Rides and sit-ins across the nation – and members of the Congress of Racial Equality are often thrown into the shadows of these looming historical figures. If you want to celebrate the Civil Rights Movement as a part of BHM, celebrate people like Fred Shuttlesworth, who led the march in Birmingham after those four little girls died, and A. Philip Randolph, the organizer of the Million Man March and the March on Washington, rather than the same handful of clichéd leaders – learn something new, learn something about the thousands of other faceless, nameless people who made the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act possible.





And Black history does not simply consist of what happened in the 1960s; rather, there is a wealth of literature, music, art, dance, and theatre that dates back to the 1600s which has remained largely unrecognized by the general American public. The Harlem Renaissance is among the most influential American literary movements – but we only hear about Langston Hughes and occasionally Zora Neal Hurston; why are we not taught the works of Richard Wright or Dorothy West? People of our generation tend to forget that jazz originated in Black America, with artists like Miles Davis and Charlie Parker; we tend to forget, or sometimes don’t even know, that our parents’ beloved rock ‘n’ roll came from the musical genius of John Coltrane, Bo Diddley, and Nina Simone. Black art and its movements have also had an incredible yet overlooked influence on American art – how many of us can name even three Black artists? While we learn about Jackson Pollack and Edward Hopper, why do the names Aaron Douglas and Jacob Lawrence never reach our ears? How many of us know that the Charleston, the Jitterbug, and the Twist have roots in the same Black America that produced tap and break dancing? Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun is one of the most important landmarks in not only Black theatre, but general American theatre as well – but this play couldn’t have been written without something to build upon. Where are the acknowledgements of the other Black productions that helped create this – where are the mentions of Alice Childress’ Trouble in Mind and William Blackwell Branch’s In Splendid Error?
Black History Month was created to teach Americans – black, white, red, brown, orange – about a group of people whose historical importance has been either overlooked or simply ignored until recently. Rather than making the most of this opportunity, however, each of us, myself included, has allowed ourselves to take a backseat in what was meant to be a learning process. We’re not questioning why we only hear about the same five or six people every year; we’re not questioning why Black History Month has somehow morphed into Civil Rights Month (not that this movement was not important – but it was not the only thing that ever happened in the history of Black America); we’re letting ourselves be content with what little knowledge is provided by our biased and outdated textbooks, by the uninterested media, by random, too-short presentations made only during this month. This year, we should try to use this month as it was intended to be used: let’s try to learn about Black History.
 
#2
*sheds a tear*

Overall I like it, sums up something pretty well. But being Black myself I never thought about the things you mentioned, there are some many unnoticed figures that have not made the social list. It's kinda sad.
 
#3
Valeoz said:
*sheds a tear*

Overall I like it, sums up something pretty well. But being Black myself I never thought about the things you mentioned, there are some many unnoticed figures that have not made the social list. It's kinda sad.
^^^
now that you mentioned it, there is something new too me that i recently ran across.

"The Blue Mountains of Jamaica are really blue, sometimes bluer than the sky and sometimes when their bases are lost in the heat haze their summits appear enskyed, distant, remote, removed. It was to their vastness, to their hidden secret valleys and remote plateaus that men and women, in pursuit of freedom, fled to be marooned.

In the earliest days of Spanish settlement those Africans who preferred to take a chance of freedom in the mountains rather than bear the burden of slavery on the ranches and estates ran away into the wild parts, to the mountains like those that rise up from behind Port Antonio. The runaway slaves were called Maroons from the Spanish word 'cimmarron' meaning "wild" or "untamed." As the number of African slaves brought to Jamaica increased so too did the number of Maroons.

Some held the wild lands known as the 'Cockpit Country' or the 'Land of Look Behind,' with their chief base at Accompong. Another band was based on Nanny Town. These kept Port Antonio in a state f terror early in the 18th century. A third band held the eastern Blue Mountains under the leadership of men like Quaco. Experts in guerrilla warfare, they would win battle after battle against the British. The maroons would sweep down in the silence of the pre-dawn shifting in and out of the circling mist."

that's just the jist of the story, i'm not gonna hit ya with mind sleep. i only found out about this a couple weeks ago. It basically explains the history of these "unknown figures" at least too most people in the south anway. ain't no tellin why. as well as telling us that "Cudjoe" is not just the name of some crazy ass dog. sooooo, if the shit strikes ya interest just google it or....
http://www.nalis.gov.tt/Communities/MaroonsofJamaica.htm
 
#5
Good essay, and I totally agree with you.

The sad thing is, most people don't really know much about Malcolm X, the Black panthers, or even Martin Luther King even. They may vaguely know martin, and his I have a Dream speech. But I dont know very many people who could really name a malcolm speech, or tell me something he said, or even name off a black panther.

And actually I did a Harlem Renaissance report last year for American Literature and explored a lot of different poets/musicians/artists from that time period. But everyone did something else, so that was just me.

And my dad always stresses to me how rock and roll originated from black jazz mucisians. But now that I think about it, I'm sort of unique in that aspect. Even though I'm white, its sad that I'm one of the few at my school that know anything about black history, you know?

So overall, I agree with you. Schools don't really focus much on Black History month THAT much anyway, you know? "Thats why Martin's in our textbook every other week, he tells us to get slapped and turn the other cheek" haha.
 

S O F I

Administrator
Staff member
#7
Little Skittle said:
good essay, but the whole concept of black history month is racist
Your response to Valeoz' question better not involve this phrase: "White History month."
 

Little Skittle

Well-Known Member
#8
Valeoz said:
I seriously have to ask how. You better explain it good.

A month dedicated to strictly learning about one race of people. Do you not see anything racist at all about that?

Before I continue:

1) I'm sorry S O F I S T I K.

2) I'm not trying to offend anyone, and I apologize if I say something that offends anyone.

Picture this, there's a white history month, which was completely dedicated to and exclusively white history. What would you say? Racist? I'm white, and I think it would be racist. A month where you're supposed to learn about nothing in history/english class, but one color of people. If Langston Hughes is as good as Robert Frost (which he is), we will learn about him anyways, which we do. If MLK or Malcolm X were as influential as JFK (which they were), we will learn about them anyways, which we do. We shouldn't learn about people based on the color of the skin, rather on their impact on our society as a whole. We shouldn't have to learn about James Bevel or Jacob Lawrence. Why? Because they weren't as influential as MLK or Edward Hopper. Do you learn about Frank Sinatra or Elvis Presley in a classroom? No. Should you have to? No. Why? Because they aren't pivotal figures in American history. So why should you have to learn about Bo Didley and Nina Simone? Again, our learning material should be based on your importance to the nation, not the color of your skin. Learning about unimportant people because they are a certain color, is racist (if you're singling out that race).
 
#9
^^^^But the schoolsystem isn't totally fair tho. There are/might be some (black) people who've had a great impact but aren't acknowledged by the "society" or the white supremacy. I'm very positive there are alot more black persons that were important then the ones you read about in school. Slavery was a pretty long period, and it CAN'T just have 2-4 persons that were influental, there was probably "heros" at that time too but yet you never hear about them. So a black month may be an opportunity for the black community to read about someone else then MLK and Malcolm X.

In fact, I've read awhile ago about the first black woman that worked in a bank or something. Anyway it's was interesting and I'm very sure there are alot more stuff to be told then the things school teach. As long as it's about knowing the history and taking stuff from it to move on then it's good to have a black month. Nothing wrong with that, it's not like they're going to have some KKK meatings and talk about how they gonna kill whites.
 
#10
Little Skittle said:
A month dedicated to strictly learning about one race of people. Do you not see anything racist at all about that?

Picture this, there's a white history month, which was completely dedicated to and exclusively white history. What would you say? Racist? I'm white, and I think it would be racist. A month where you're supposed to learn about nothing in history/english class, but one color of people. If Langston Hughes is as good as Robert Frost (which he is), we will learn about him anyways, which we do. If MLK or Malcolm X were as influential as JFK (which they were), we will learn about them anyways, which we do. We shouldn't learn about people based on the color of the skin, rather on their impact on our society as a whole. We shouldn't have to learn about James Bevel or Jacob Lawrence. Why? Because they weren't as influential as MLK or Edward Hopper. Do you learn about Frank Sinatra or Elvis Presley in a classroom? No. Should you have to? No. Why? Because they aren't pivotal figures in American history. So why should you have to learn about Bo Didley and Nina Simone? Again, our learning material should be based on your importance to the nation, not the color of your skin. Learning about unimportant people because they are a certain color, is racist (if you're singling out that race).
Black history month is about achievement and discovery. And what you don't realize is that every accomplishment blacks have done is important to the nation. By the use of the American Constitution we have moved America closer to its true essence. The achievements of blacks have helped shape today's society.

Much of America's history we have been considered the untouchables, impossibility for us was always around the corner. And those black people who overcame that impossibility should be remembered. History and its events should never be forgotten.

And saying black history month is about a skin color, is racist, we're not just a skin color. The African-Americans are people with a rich culture that consists of music, art, dance, and literature. The fathers of rock 'n roll, blues, jazz, and hip-hop. Something that is widely used today by everybody in America. And we are proud of that. This is what Black History month is for, to discover those who have made an impact in American society, that were never acknowledged. A major thing that is not acknowledged today is that blacks (and mexicans) were the original cowboys. But today a cowboy is referenced with a white person. We're also not strangers of country music. It is because of Black History month and Black Cowboy Parades that we learn about stuff like this.

I suggest to you to learn more about Langston Hughes, Bo Didley, and Nina Simone. Langston Hughes was a key figure in the Harlem Reniassance, a huge cultural movement. Bo Didley is a father of today's rock 'n roll, a music revolutionary in his time. Nina Simone was a multi-talented musician, she was legendary in her time because she was a black woman. She has inspired many woman musicians today, both black and white. All three of these figures have made an impact on American society.

It's evident in this thread, we're still discovering the remarkable things blacks have done. If there was no month created to discover, who would of thought? When you learn about Black history, you're also learning about half of America's history, the un-acknowledged part.

RFTP said it best too.
 

Little Skittle

Well-Known Member
#11
Valeoz said:
Black history month is about achievement and discovery. And what you don't realize is that every accomplishment blacks have done is important to the nation. By the use of the American Constitution we have moved America closer to its true essence. The achievements of blacks have helped shape today's society.

Much of America's history we have been considered the untouchables, impossibility for us was always around the corner. And those black people who overcame that impossibility should be remembered. History and its events should never be forgotten.

And saying black history month is about a skin color, is racist, we're not just a skin color. The African-Americans are people with a rich culture that consists of music, art, dance, and literature. The fathers of rock 'n roll, blues, jazz, and hip-hop. Something that is widely used today by everybody in America. And we are proud of that. This is what Black History month is for, to discover those who have made an impact in American society, that were never acknowledged. A major thing that is not acknowledged today is that blacks (and mexicans) were the original cowboys. But today a cowboy is referenced with a white person. We're also not strangers of country music. It is because of Black History month and Black Cowboy Parades that we learn about stuff like this.

I suggest to you to learn more about Langston Hughes, Bo Didley, and Nina Simone. Langston Hughes was a key figure in the Harlem Reniassance, a huge cultural movement. Bo Didley is a father of today's rock 'n roll, a music revolutionary in his time. Nina Simone was a multi-talented musician, she was legendary in her time because she was a black woman. She has inspired many woman musicians today, both black and white. All three of these figures have made an impact on American society.

It's evident in this thread, we're still discovering the remarkable things blacks have done. If there was no month created to discover, who would of thought? When you learn about Black history, you're also learning about half of America's history, the un-acknowledged part.

RFTP said it best too.

If this month was about achievements and discoveries, it should be called "Achievements and Discoveries Month". I never said black people havent helped shape America, but so have every other culture, which is why we shouldn't single out a certain race and put them on a pedastal.

I never said black people were "just a skin color". African-Americans have their own culture. That's obvious. So does every other race and nationality. What's your point? If certain artists aren't recognized, it's for a reason. That reason is, they haven't made that much of an impact on American society. Like I said, we don't learn about Elvis in school, so why should we learn about Bo Didley? Neither of them have had significant impacts on America. But we should learn about Bo Didley because he was a black musician?

I believe we should learn about people based on the importance, like I said before. We should learn about MLK, Malcolm X, Langston Hughes, Rosa Parks, etc. Why? They had a bigger impact then the other people you mentioned. I still don't understand why we should learn about people that had little impact, because the fact that they are black.
 
#12
If this month was about achievements and discoveries, it should be called "Achievements and Discoveries Month". I never said black people havent helped shape America, but so have every other culture, which is why we shouldn't single out a certain race and put them on a pedastal.
You still don't understand. I suggest you go to the library and get some books.

About Elvis tho, Elvis plays the music Bo Didley created. One of the music popular forms of music in America today. It was the African-American culture that created rock 'n roll. Speak on what you know.

And little impact?!?! You gotta be kidding me. Please go and read some books, go to college and take African-American Studies, just take it as a minor. And ask the professor these same questions. They'll give you a better answer than I ever could.

never said black people were "just a skin color".
A month where you're supposed to learn about nothing in history/english class, but one color of people.
We shouldn't learn about people based on the color of the skin
Again, our learning material should be based on your importance to the nation, not the color of your skin. Learning about unimportant people because they are a certain color, is racist (if you're singling out that race).
 

S O F I

Administrator
Staff member
#13
Little Skittle, your posts don't show how the concept of Black History Month is racist. I think you're looking for another word/phrase to describe your opinion.
 
#14
honestly, i think black history month is probably something white folks came up with cause we kept bitchin about the lack of recognition. that's my guess. gettin the fanatical off their backs for a while.

however, i do have to say we are still lucky to get even that. cause when you look at the vast over view of it all, white people are the only race made relevant in our history. they are the only race given majority and importance. from the social studies books, children's fairy tales, and even the bible.

native americans, mexican's, asian's, black folks, and who know's who else, were involved in the growth of this country. not just "European Do Gooders".

fuck, we shouldn't even need a "black history month" to be honest. no race should have a "month". history is history, fact is fact, it should be there in the books.
 

Little Skittle

Well-Known Member
#16
Valeoz said:
You still don't understand. I suggest you go to the library and get some books.

About Elvis tho, Elvis plays the music Bo Didley created. One of the music popular forms of music in America today. It was the African-American culture that created rock 'n roll. Speak on what you know.

And little impact?!?! You gotta be kidding me. Please go and read some books, go to college and take African-American Studies, just take it as a minor. And ask the professor these same questions. They'll give you a better answer than I ever could.

I understand perfectly. I never said African-Americans didn't create rock 'n roll. That's common knowledge.

"...go to college and take African-American Studies...". Exactly. If you want to learn about this, go take a class on it. We shouldn't be force fed.

Yes, little impact. If you're going to sit here and tell me Bo Didley had the same impact as did MLK, I'll call you a fool. We learn about the people with the MOST impact. If the school year was longer, maybe we could squeeze less important things like Bo Didley into our history classes.

You took all the quotes out of context. Yes, black people obviously have dark skin. Show me where I said that they didn't have their own culture. Again, it's not called "African-American Culture Studies Month", it's called "Black History Month".

Finally, if you are going to address my comments, please comment them as a whole, and not just certain sentences. Thank you.
 
#17
Yes, little impact. If you're going to sit here and tell me Bo Didley had the same impact as did MLK, I'll call you a fool. We learn about the people with the MOST impact. If the school year was longer, maybe we could squeeze less important things like Bo Didley into our history classes.
I meant black people as a whole.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top