Yawn.
Android is OPEN SOURCE. Period. Point blank. End of story. The source is publically available. Obviously they're not going to open source it while they're still working on it. That doesn't make sense. Features get written and pulled from major releases if they aren't ready yet. Competition would steal ideas before Google got a chance to ship them.
The fact remains is that the source is right there for anyone to download, modify, compile and flash onto their own device or emulator.
As for checking in code, the Android developer community HAS been doing that, and Android since 2.0 has included many contributions from the community.
Open Source is a large term that covers a lot of differing situations, but Hewitt making arguments about "this is more open source than that" is pointless.
Android is OPEN SOURCE. Period. Point blank. End of story. The source is publically available. Obviously they're not going to open source it while they're still working on it. That doesn't make sense. Features get written and pulled from major releases if they aren't ready yet. Competition would steal ideas before Google got a chance to ship them.
The fact remains is that the source is right there for anyone to download, modify, compile and flash onto their own device or emulator.
As for checking in code, the Android developer community HAS been doing that, and Android since 2.0 has included many contributions from the community.
Open Source is a large term that covers a lot of differing situations, but Hewitt making arguments about "this is more open source than that" is pointless.