devils_advok8 said:
My point exactly.How's it that some people are rich, famous, popular, intelligent, athletic, etc etc and others are the precise opposite?does it even out somehow or in general the first person is better?How can he better when we're all human beings and all created equal?Does it even out?
Let's say you're playing The Sims and you're creating a custom family. Each character starts with a number of base points you can spread out over different areas. Some of the characters will be better than others in certain areas, but they'll all be even.
That's not how it is in real life. The term "created equal" is misleading because it implies a sense of "intelligent design". Nobody sits down with a piece of paper and says "OK, this kid isn't going to be too smart but we'll make up for that by making him athletic". How 'good' you are at something is down to what you get given (nature) and what you do with it (nurture). Nothing guarantees you're on the same level as the next guy.
devils_advok8 said:
Good point, but how's it fair that one person feels like he's got everything, regardless of wether we think it's superficial or not and another feels empty inside and like he's got nothing, like his life has got less value than the other person?Is it our fault that it's the kinda "system" we use to look upon someone and decide on what their life's worth?