Illuminattile said:
I have no idea.
AIDs, poverty and famine are the 'easy' ones, relatively speaking. Those are problems that can be solved with science and money.
Which makes me wonder, if they are relatively easy to fix why have they been put on the backburner for so long. We have (or rather long had) the power to do something to make a concerted effort to reduce poverty and famine as well as contain AIDs, yet the way I see it, not nearly enough has been done... there is a far greater capacity to invoke change in these areas which isnt being utilised.
As for nuclear proliferation and global terrorism, one the main problems there I think is that not enough regard is paid to the causes of these issues, instead policies are responsive and morally damning, yet this probably serves to reinforce the sentiments behind these acts. So I'd suggest policy should be centred on overcoming the causes, not action plans for response. In addition, perhaps it should also include some internal reflection for all nations, it's all handled subjectively without much regard for the bigger picture.
Even though I study international relations in the context of security, I think greater emphasis should be placed on humanitarian issues as well as the environment. Whilst security is desirable, I think other issues such as the health and wellbeing of all people and earth itself should take precedence.