I'm finally gonna start training again next week. My decayin body is in for a shock. But I've got a question about routines. Previously, I've always used the following three-day split:
Day 1: Legs/abs
Day 2: Chest/Tri/Shoulders
Day 3: Back/Bi
I used to throw in 2 cardio sessions and 2-3 Muay Thai sessions too, but this isn't too relevant.
Now, I've heard the thinking behind doing your back/bi and chest/tri on the same days is because when doing certain excercises focusing on one muscle group, the other is also worked out (eg: bench press works out chest AND tri's or lat-pull works out back AND bi's). The nagging feeling with this though is that your not getting the most out of a muscle group when focusing on it. For example, if I do a total of 12 sets of chest exercises, I can't do a full 12 sets of tricep exercises because the tri's are fatigued from the chest exercises. So instead of isolating the muscle and hitting it hard with a full 12 sets, I indirectly hit it with say 8 and directly hit it with 8.
I've thought of using this split (read it from somewhere):
Day 1: Chest/bi
Day 2: Legs/abs
Day 3: Back/tri/shoulders
The thinking behind this is that I can isolate and hit a muscle hard on its given day. And although, for example, on Day 1 I'm inadvertantly hitting the triceps it won't affect my dedicated tricep day as there is a rest period in between. This way I can complete more sets directed at a specific muscle group, as well as a few indirect sets in there as well.
So my question is, which is better and makes more sense? Or doesn't it matter?
Day 1: Legs/abs
Day 2: Chest/Tri/Shoulders
Day 3: Back/Bi
I used to throw in 2 cardio sessions and 2-3 Muay Thai sessions too, but this isn't too relevant.
Now, I've heard the thinking behind doing your back/bi and chest/tri on the same days is because when doing certain excercises focusing on one muscle group, the other is also worked out (eg: bench press works out chest AND tri's or lat-pull works out back AND bi's). The nagging feeling with this though is that your not getting the most out of a muscle group when focusing on it. For example, if I do a total of 12 sets of chest exercises, I can't do a full 12 sets of tricep exercises because the tri's are fatigued from the chest exercises. So instead of isolating the muscle and hitting it hard with a full 12 sets, I indirectly hit it with say 8 and directly hit it with 8.
I've thought of using this split (read it from somewhere):
Day 1: Chest/bi
Day 2: Legs/abs
Day 3: Back/tri/shoulders
The thinking behind this is that I can isolate and hit a muscle hard on its given day. And although, for example, on Day 1 I'm inadvertantly hitting the triceps it won't affect my dedicated tricep day as there is a rest period in between. This way I can complete more sets directed at a specific muscle group, as well as a few indirect sets in there as well.
So my question is, which is better and makes more sense? Or doesn't it matter?