OK well if you guys can try to ignore the fact that most of us probably watch some pornography now and then (some more than others), what is it that really makes pornography different enough from prostitution that they deserve to be treated differently in they eyes of the law? To me it seems, if a woman (or man) is getting paid for sex, she's getting paid for sex, I don't see why the purpose of the sexual act makes a difference. Somebody explain this to me, if you agree with me, elaborate on why you think it is this way.
Oh yeah, no pics. Got y'all good.
Oh yeah, no pics. Got y'all good.