Former Attorney General John Ashcroft spoke tonight at UNC's Memorial Hall.
My initial response to him was that he was powerful on stage. He was a prolific speaker, seemed passionate about what he was saying. He gave a riveting account of his day on September 11, 2001. After that, it went all down hill.
After his story, he started talking about what we should have taken from 9/11 and about preventing further attacks. He said nothing of substance, simply using buzz words and appealing to values rather than policy. My girlfriend was likewise severely disappointed, saying she felt like he was talking to community college students rather than some of the top university students in the country.
I wasn't surprised. I knew he was going to be full of shit and not say anything truly detailed and pertinent. I expected it. What really got to me and surprised me was that he was not prepared for the Q&A afterwards. He danced around questions about Palestine, solutions to the disarray in Iraq, and every other subject that was brought up. When asked what he felt his biggest mistake was, he answered that it was not pushing the Patriot Act hard enough (*chuckle*).
At least give us the respect of being prepared to answer questions about current events. He even responded with an "I don't know" to one question.
I would talk about issues he spoke on, but he he spent all his time saying a lot about nothing. He talked about balancing liberty and security, a little about the wiretaps, and that it is better for the world to remove oppressive leaders like Saddam (though had no answers about other regions that were in peril like Sudan and Cambodia, the two of which he was aked about specifically).
All in all - great speaker, full of shit.
My initial response to him was that he was powerful on stage. He was a prolific speaker, seemed passionate about what he was saying. He gave a riveting account of his day on September 11, 2001. After that, it went all down hill.
After his story, he started talking about what we should have taken from 9/11 and about preventing further attacks. He said nothing of substance, simply using buzz words and appealing to values rather than policy. My girlfriend was likewise severely disappointed, saying she felt like he was talking to community college students rather than some of the top university students in the country.
I wasn't surprised. I knew he was going to be full of shit and not say anything truly detailed and pertinent. I expected it. What really got to me and surprised me was that he was not prepared for the Q&A afterwards. He danced around questions about Palestine, solutions to the disarray in Iraq, and every other subject that was brought up. When asked what he felt his biggest mistake was, he answered that it was not pushing the Patriot Act hard enough (*chuckle*).
At least give us the respect of being prepared to answer questions about current events. He even responded with an "I don't know" to one question.
I would talk about issues he spoke on, but he he spent all his time saying a lot about nothing. He talked about balancing liberty and security, a little about the wiretaps, and that it is better for the world to remove oppressive leaders like Saddam (though had no answers about other regions that were in peril like Sudan and Cambodia, the two of which he was aked about specifically).
All in all - great speaker, full of shit.