I'm not entirely sure "how it all went down," my bible studies leave something to be desired, but....
One thing I found interesting in a book I was reading was the suggestion that Jesus was an ordinary man of little significance, but who's story was exaggerated overtime and misinterpreted to create the Jesus that we know of today.
Apparently Jesus made little progress in the establishment of the Jerusalem Church and was never well known nor renouned for performing miracles. Rather it was his brother, James who progressed the Church and the wrong story of Jesus was portrayed and accepted by latter Churches by a man wholly unconnected to Jesus himself (I forget the man's name, I dont have the book with me).
In addition the so called "miracles" were merely every day acts described in a poetic way, which if read in light of the method of expression at the time, hold little significance and cast shadow on the image of Jesus and the elevated status that we have been lead to accept.
This theory appeals to me, because while I am open to the idea of a God of some description, the belief in Jesus which is the basis of the Christian beliefs around me, has always been harder to accept. As a man, I admire his concerned for humanity and the extent of his faith, as for being the son of God, i just dont know.....