Blatter: Foreigners Hurting England

Flipmo

VIP Member
Staff member
#1
Blatter: Foreigners Hurting England

FIFA president Sepp Blatter has cited the increasing number of foreign players in the Premiership as the underlining reason for England’s failure to qualify for Euro 2008.

England missed out on qualification courtesy of a 3-2 home defeat to Croatia in their final group game which saw them finish behind Slaven Bilic’s side and Russia in Group E.

Speaking on the nation’s failings Blatter commented that sides such as Manchester United, Arsenal and Chelsea are giving foreign players a platform to improve their own ability and thus the quality of their national side, a factor that weakens the England team as home grown players are continually left out of the team.

Speaking to Reuters at the University of Switzerland, Blatter said: “Football is unpredictable and sometimes without any logic but it is a fact that in the strongest English teams the best players are not always English.

"So where are the best English players coming from? They are coming from the less strong teams, which is weakening the English national team. What is happening in England is that the best teams are preparing the national team players for England's opponents."

The Premier League has benefited the other countries taking part in the European championships, but not England."

Blatter continues to moot the “6+5” proposal which would see clubs have to field six domestic players and just five from overseas. His controversial offering has become the talking point of clubs around Europe and despite an initial dismissal by the European Union, Blatter is defiant in his bid.

"I am very happy that this has been accepted that the dialogue goes on, as long as we discuss, there is always a way to find possible solutions," he added.

"There has been much opposition to the plan since we first went public with it at the FIFA Congress in Munich two years ago, and the opposition is still coming from UEFA who want to remain on good terms with the European Union. But the EU is a political union with 27 independent states covering 30 football associations and one parliament and one commission."

One piece of legislation conjured by UEFA has been viewed in a more favourable light by the EU parliament, that of the ‘home-grown’ rule which states that teams must contain a certain quota of players to progress from their academies, though there are no restrictions on nationality.

Blatter is taking inspiration from UEFA’s ruling and remains convinced that he can persuade the EU that his own proposal is to the benefit of international sides."

Yesterday, the French President, Mr Sarkozy said that there must be an exemption for sport and this will be a matter for him when he has the presidency of the European Union from July 1.

"There has to be a solution and sport has to have an exemption. You also cannot have 27 European states making the rules for 208 members of FIFA from all over the world," he continued.

"It is not possible. We are saying to the politicians, do not think that Europe is alone in the world. Everyone preaches solidarity but then they should show some more solidarity themselves. We have to defend the integrity of the worldwide game.

"If it becomes EU law, then it will be a football law as well, and the clubs will accept it.

“There will be no breakaway."

-----------

What are your opinions on this?
 
#2
Affirmative Action? No thanks. If there's a problem with a lack of English talent (which is debatable) the FA need to identify the source and do something about it. The Academy system doesn't work, for a start.

Real Madrid and Barcelona don't field 6 Spaniards every week, but Spain managed to qualify for the Euros. How many Italians are in Inter's first XI? Didn't stop Italy from qualifying for the Euros.

If you look at the elite European clubs - United, Chelsea, Liverpool, Arsenal, Real, Barcelona, Juventus, Milan, Inter - that's 9 clubs. 9 clubs fielding 5 foreigners each, which is 45 players. That includes all the World Class players from Brazil, Argentina, Portugal, France, Holland, Germany, Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa... where are they all going to go?
 

Bobby Sands

Well-Known Member
#3
Coaching is the problem with England and Ireland. Too much emphasis is place on the physical side of the game and not enough on technique and skill.Its alway the big strong guy that plays central midfield, its never a small skillful player.
 

hizzle?

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#4
Affirmative Action? No thanks. If there's a problem with a lack of English talent (which is debatable) the FA need to identify the source and do something about it. The Academy system doesn't work, for a start.

Real Madrid and Barcelona don't field 6 Spaniards every week, but Spain managed to qualify for the Euros. How many Italians are in Inter's first XI? Didn't stop Italy from qualifying for the Euros.

If you look at the elite European clubs - United, Chelsea, Liverpool, Arsenal, Real, Barcelona, Juventus, Milan, Inter - that's 9 clubs. 9 clubs fielding 5 foreigners each, which is 45 players. That includes all the World Class players from Brazil, Argentina, Portugal, France, Holland, Germany, Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa... where are they all going to go?
Club Brugge. :thumb:
 

tHuG $TyLe

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#5
Coaching is the problem with England and Ireland. Too much emphasis is place on the physical side of the game and not enough on technique and skill.Its alway the big strong guy that plays central midfield, its never a small skillful player.
Indeed.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#6
Blatter is talking out of his ass, like he always does.

The reason England failed to qualify for the Euro's is become they thought they were home safe after the 2-2 against Croatia. Would that score have remained on the board, England would've just qualified and no one would say a word.

They just bottled it. Had nothing to do with the quality of the selection imo.
 

hizzle?

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#7
I just hate it when people say England has too much good of a team not to be in the Euros...

Well if they were that good, they wouldn't finished third after Croatia and fucking Russia now wouldn't they...

They finished 3rd in their group. Just like Norway, Bulgaria, Serbia,Ukraine, Ireland and Northern Ireland. They are in that group of teams.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#8
I just hate it when people say England has too much good of a team not to be in the Euros...

Well if they were that good, they wouldn't finished third after Croatia and fucking Russia now wouldn't they...

They finished 3rd in their group. Just like Norway, Bulgaria, Serbia,Ukraine, Ireland and Northern Ireland. They are in that group of teams.
Nonsense. When Netherlands failed to qualify for WC 2002 it didn't mean we were of the same level as fucking Malta or something.

The English just bottled it. Period. We can all go looking for intricate explanations and have a good time ripping them a new one, but the fact of the matter is that those Tommies were off the pace and unfocused the last 20 minutes against Croatia.

That cost them the tourney. That and only that.

Don't forget Italy qualified by the skin of their teeth as well.
 

Bobby Sands

Well-Known Member
#9
Nonsense. When Netherlands failed to qualify for WC 2002 it didn't mean we were of the same level as fucking Malta or something.

The English just bottled it. Period. We can all go looking for intricate explanations and have a good time ripping them a new one, but the fact of the matter is that those Tommies were off the pace and unfocused the last 20 minutes against Croatia.

That cost them the tourney. That and only that.

Don't forget Italy qualified by the skin of their teeth as well.
Remind me who knocked ye out again :D

The reason England are not in Euro 2008 is because Croatia played better football and beat them twice. The outplayed England in both games.England were very lucky that the score at Wembley was 3-2 and not 3-0.Croatia were technically superior to them. Ok, England were missing some key players but the football they played at the last World Cup and during the qualifiers was pure shite and awful to watch. If they were in Euro 2008 and played like they did at the last World Cup, then i am glad they are not there.

There was an interesting article in 442 a few months back about how England is really far behind countries like France,Holland and Spain when it comes to developing young players. As i said in my above post, there is a huge emphasis on physicality and not near enough on the technical side of the game. Its different in France, Spain and Holland.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#14
For the last time, there's nothing wrong with the English squad. They just got complacent the last 20 minutes against the Croats. Coupled with a relatively poor qualifying session (let's not forget the Italians and French also barely qualified over Scotland) and the lazy attitude in that one crucial match.
 

tHuG $TyLe

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#15
For the last time, there's nothing wrong with the English squad. They just got complacent the last 20 minutes against the Croats. Coupled with a relatively poor qualifying session (let's not forget the Italians and French also barely qualified over Scotland) and the lazy attitude in that one crucial match.
What about against Macedonia at home though? Or Isreal away? It wasnt all down to the Croatia game, if we had beaten Macedonia then that match would not of mattered.
 

roaches

Well-Known Member
#16
"So where are the best English players coming from? They are coming from the less strong teams, which is weakening the English national team.
Wouldn't they be playing for weaker teams because they're weaker players? So wouldn't England lose regardless? Lol at this maroon.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#17
What about against Macedonia at home though? Or Isreal away? It wasnt all down to the Croatia game, if we had beaten Macedonia then that match would not of mattered.

In every qualifying session, on or more A-countries have a rough road. Look at France and Italy's group. Scotland almost knocked one of them out, also due to poor results against lesser opponents.

If England had qualified, this whole discussion wouldn't have taken place.

Football is a cruel game and the differences are very small at times.
 

Duke

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#18
Wouldn't they be playing for weaker teams because they're weaker players? So wouldn't England lose regardless? Lol at this maroon.

That quote is some more prime quality bullshit coming out of Blatters (death may befall him) mouth. First off, many if not all big national squads have players from lesser squads in the selection.

And second, Lampard, Gerrard, Crouch, Rooney, Rio etc etc...sure, they all play for "the weaker teams".

Blatter (death may befall him) has once more proven he is a fat, corrupt piece of fucking shit that hasnt got a clue about football.

He should die.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top