Arsenal sign Theo Walcott

#1
Arsenal have completed the signing of Southampton starlet Theo Walcott for an initial fee of £5 million.



That figure could rise to £12 million, depending on club and international appearances, and the 16-year-old will link up with the Premiership outfit immediately.

He has initially joined the club as a scholar and will only sign full professional forms when he celebrates his 17th birthday on March 16.

Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger says that he is delighted to have signed the youngster, telling the club's official website: "Theo Walcott is a very young player, but has already shown in his performances for Southampton that he is a talented player with huge potential.

"I also like the fact that he is a versatile player who is incredibly dedicated, shows great determination to succeed and is blessed with electric pace. We are delighted Theo has signed for the club and will make a fantastic addition to our squad.”

Walcott himself added: "I’m so pleased to be joining Arsenal, a club I have admired for a long time. Coming to Arsenal will give me the opportunity to work with world class players every day and play football at the highest possible level.

"It’s a strange day, because I’m also very sad to be moving from Southampton. I’m leaving many friends and some great coaches who have been so important to my career so far, but I leave with many great memories from the club.

"I’m now really looking forward to meeting my new team-mates and working hard as an Arsenal player.”

Saints chairman Rupert Lowe was understandably downbeat about the deal, however, confessing that he may have made a mistake in placing Walcott's talents in the shop window at such an early stage.

"We are bitterly disappointed," he admitted. "The purpose of developing the best academy in the country is not to sell scholars to larger clubs.

"We have done everything to keep Theo at Southampton but his family and advisors are determined that he leave this club and go to Arsenal.

“Theo has shown what he is capable of in his first season of senior football and I know every Saints fan will feel let down.

“We have been put in a situation where, (on the advice of Theo's advisors) we either negotiated compensation with Theo’s preferred club or faced ending up in front of the Football League Appeals Committee following cancellation.

"The largest upfront award that body has ever made was £400,000. Had Theo joined an overseas club, the situation could have been even worse with no appeal committee and payment only of Fifa compensation on a set scale.

"Sometimes you have to be a pragmatist."

Lowe went on to add that, although he feels the transfer highlights a loophole which needs closing, he also accepts that some fans will blame him for the prodigy's departure.

"I have no doubt that I will be blamed for this situation by a part of the fan base but if the board and I have been at fault; it has been in playing and therefore showcasing a young player who is not under a full professional contract," he continued.

“The loophole this episode has revealed needs to be remedied by the football establishment as a matter of urgency before the Academy system is discredited. Perhaps England should move to a system such as that in the Czech Republic where young players can be signed as a professional at 16.

"The game needs young people like Theo but this won't happen if the clubs who produce them suffer the same fate as we would in this case."

It had been rumoured that Walcott could return to St Mary's in a loan deal, but that will not happen as FA rules do not permit the loaning of a scholar, while Arsenal are understood to want sole responsibility for the player's future development.
Not a bad deal on Arsenal's part. If he does turn out to be Wayne Rooney MKII (doubtful) then they've got him pretty cheap, if he turns out to be Francis Jeffers MKII then they won't have spent too much on him. I still think Wenger should be signing defenders instead of wingers, but hey.
 

tHuG $TyLe

Well-Known Member
Staff member
#4
Too much money already for him.

Good player but hes still a young kid, and i think might be a little weak for the premiership.
 
#5
Its risky and stupid in any proffesional sport to give such young man such money because you dont know what exactly you gonna get out of him. and by giving him such money early, he will not fight or prove he deserves that money. this sends wrong message. giving such money to somebody you dont know even know how good he can be is just wrong. you need to let the player play and then give money based on how good he did. not other way around.

This kinda stuff happends a lot in NBA and its wrong.
 

Taliq

On Probation: Please report any break in the guide
#6
^He's not been paid £12m (or £5m) for the move, his former club has.

Seems like a good prospect but maybe its a bit too much too early for him. He doesn't seem "bullish" enough to be played in the premiership yet and there's a risk of him not fulfilling his potential at this stage especially in a team like Arsenal who lack character and strong leadership at the moment
 
#8
Bachaveli said:
Isn't he getting 12mill or 5mill?
No, Southampton Football Club are getting £5m/£12m.

Once he turns 17 he'll get a nice big contract, but since it's Arsenal he won't be getting that much.

ThUg $TyLe said:
Good player but hes still a young kid, and i think might be a little weak for the premiership.
He does need to bulk up. The reason Rooney's been able to excel is because he's big and strong. Walcott's speed won't be much good if he gets muscled off the ball all the time.

Let's face it, Arsenal only splashed out on the kid now to stop Chelsea getting him. Take Chel$ea out of the equation and the price would have been a lot lower.
 
#9
Unfortunelty, todays game has changed dramatically compare to lets say 20-30 years ago. its sad that coaches number one priority these days in players is their physicall strength where as back in the day it was technical ability.

I'm old school type. i dont think size beats intellegence. i dont care how skinny and weak the player might be, if he is intelligent enough size doesnt matter.(ex: Robinhio from real madrid). but unfortunalty, thats not the case today. people search for physicall strength. and i think thats destroying the game. it changes the game because there are technicall players being left out because of their weak physicall strength. having all this said i also like seen hard fought physicall games and physicall players like Rooney's, but i prefer watching and playing calm,technicall soccer rather then physicall, cry babies ''agh im gonna break your leg cause you made a move on me' Garry Neville type a players.
 
#10
It's all very well to be technically gifted, pacy and skillful, but no defender is going to just let you waltz right past them. You need to at least have enough strength to hold off a challenge otherwise you won't be able to put your skill to use.
 
#11
I agree some what. i just dislike how coaches form players physically like robots. i know i've had experience. most of the trainings you get physicall trainings. lifting weights?biceps and chest muscles. who needs that in soccer. this aint no wrestling. lets face it. if you start concetrating physicall ability so much eventually you become heavy player and wont be able to run as quick and wont be able to make makes cause that heavy weight is stoping you.

You notice how games are played today specially in england. pass-pass-pass-pass.. its all good to pass but there are a lot of unnecessery passing. watch England play and then watch Brazilia play. Brazilians do pass too. but they dont make those extra unnecessery passes. so many extra passes todays games is radiculous. players dont like to take chances and make a move or two. no, instead they pass and pass. where im getting at with this is that this pass-pass game is the result of how coaches demand for young players to be, physically extremely strong. when you that strong then you dont ability to make that run pass by defender or make that move or two so what you do? you pass and pass and like a pool game you hoping to get in golie by getting there with all the pass balls.

I just hate how the game is been run today and what people are doing to young kids.putting so much physicall strength in them. thats it and thats all.
 

Taliq

On Probation: Please report any break in the guide
#14
Bachaveli said:
I agree some what. i just dislike how coaches form players physically like robots. i know i've had experience. most of the trainings you get physicall trainings. lifting weights?biceps and chest muscles. who needs that in soccer. this aint no wrestling. lets face it. if you start concetrating physicall ability so much eventually you become heavy player and wont be able to run as quick and wont be able to make makes cause that heavy weight is stoping you.

You notice how games are played today specially in england. pass-pass-pass-pass.. its all good to pass but there are a lot of unnecessery passing. watch England play and then watch Brazilia play. Brazilians do pass too. but they dont make those extra unnecessery passes. so many extra passes todays games is radiculous. players dont like to take chances and make a move or two. no, instead they pass and pass. where im getting at with this is that this pass-pass game is the result of how coaches demand for young players to be, physically extremely strong. when you that strong then you dont ability to make that run pass by defender or make that move or two so what you do? you pass and pass and like a pool game you hoping to get in golie by getting there with all the pass balls.

I just hate how the game is been run today and what people are doing to young kids.putting so much physicall strength in them. thats it and thats all.
I don't think it'a a case of be technical OR have strength. To survive in todays game who can and have to be both. This, in my opinion, makes todays game better in many ways. Players are bigger, faster, stronger and have the same if not more technical skill than the players of yesteryear. You think Ronaldinho or Zidane are all technique and no size? These players are big and strong as well as being physically strong. Thats the level you have to be at to perform at the highest level these days. Players are now athletes as well as people who can do fancy skills with footballs.

You say you've got experience in training regimes etc, but your knowledge of this apsect of the game seems obtuse. The pass pass pass method the English use has more or less always been the English style of play. And the Brazilian method of play is not all just skill. I mean look at them, they're big players who have skill AND physical strength.
 
#15
Taliq said:
I don't think it'a a case of be technical OR have strength. To survive in todays game who can and have to be both. This, in my opinion, makes todays game better in many ways. Players are bigger, faster, stronger and have the same if not more technical skill than the players of yesteryear. You think Ronaldinho or Zidane are all technique and no size? These players are big and strong as well as being physically strong. Thats the level you have to be at to perform at the highest level these days. Players are now athletes as well as people who can do fancy skills with footballs.

You say you've got experience in training regimes etc, but your knowledge of this apsect of the game seems obtuse. The pass pass pass method the English use has more or less always been the English style of play. And the Brazilian method of play is not all just skill. I mean look at them, they're big players who have skill AND physical strength.
Why would you built up a soccer player to be big? this aint no basketball or wrestling. only strenght you really need in soccer is in your leg muscles. you dont need to be lifting no weights on upper body. that actually demises your lower body strenght and skill. you might say well, why not put strength on upper body and be strong all around, its only gonna make you stronger but no like i said, it affects your lower strength and skill.

I'm just saying i dislike how coaches recruit young kids based on their physicall ability rather then skill ability now days. game looks so easy today. its seems like almost only thing you need to know how to do is stop the ball and pass the ball to the next guy. that simple.

I dont think todays players have better skill all around compare to back in the days players. hell no. theres only few people todays game who can dominate the games and dribble and go against the grain really to be honest. theres not many skillfull players if you ask me.

Players are now athletes? what the hell you think players back in the days were? robots who happen to be soccer players? this what im tryna say players back then were athletes for soccer only.

Brazilian style is skill,intelligence and knowing what to do on the field. not passing the ball around too much for no reason. when they pass they pass the ball for the reason and it was meant to be a pass. unlike in England, you see players touc,touch,touch passing all the time. no one wasnts to take a risk and dribble to the field.
Brazilian dont really have big strong players. only one i can think of is Adriano.
 

Taliq

On Probation: Please report any break in the guide
#17
Bachaveli said:
Why would you built up a soccer player to be big? this aint no basketball or wrestling. only strenght you really need in soccer is in your leg muscles. you dont need to be lifting no weights on upper body. that actually demises your lower body strenght and skill. you might say well, why not put strength on upper body and be strong all around, its only gonna make you stronger but no like i said, it affects your lower strength and skill.

I'm just saying i dislike how coaches recruit young kids based on their physicall ability rather then skill ability now days. game looks so easy today. its seems like almost only thing you need to know how to do is stop the ball and pass the ball to the next guy. that simple.

I dont think todays players have better skill all around compare to back in the days players. hell no. theres only few people todays game who can dominate the games and dribble and go against the grain really to be honest. theres not many skillfull players if you ask me.

Players are now athletes? what the hell you think players back in the days were? robots who happen to be soccer players? this what im tryna say players back then were athletes for soccer only.

Brazilian style is skill,intelligence and knowing what to do on the field. not passing the ball around too much for no reason. when they pass they pass the ball for the reason and it was meant to be a pass. unlike in England, you see players touc,touch,touch passing all the time. no one wasnts to take a risk and dribble to the field.
Brazilian dont really have big strong players. only one i can think of is Adriano.
No.
 

Jibster

Active Member
#18
The guys two-footed, has electric pace, can run with the ball, play on either wing or upfront and can also deliver a decent cross. Apparently he's also a level headed kid too from a decent family so isn't likely to waste his career.

Anyone see his goal against Luton for Southampton? Sheer class for a 16-year old.

Get on him (betting wise) as the surprise inclusion in the World Cup squad.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top