ABC and their exclusive Sadaam Tapes

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#1
http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Investigation/story?id=1616996
Feb. 15, 2006 — ABC News has obtained 12 hours of tape recordings of Saddam Hussein meeting with top aides during the 1990s, tapes apparently recorded in Baghdad's version of the Oval Office.

ABC News obtained the tapes from Bill Tierney, a former member of a United Nations inspection team who translated them for the FBI. Tierney said the U.S. government is wrong to keep these tapes and others secret from the public. "Because of my experience being in the inspections and being in the military, I knew the significance of these tapes when I heard them," says Tierney. U.S. officials have confirmed the tapes are authentic, and that they are among hundreds of hours of tapes Saddam recorded in his palace office.

One of the most dramatic moments in the 12 hours of recordings comes when Saddam predicts — during a meeting in the mid 1990s — a terrorist attack on the United States. "Terrorism is coming. I told the Americans a long time before August 2 and told the British as well … that in the future there will be terrorism with weapons of mass destruction." Saddam goes on to say such attacks would be difficult to stop. "In the future, what would prevent a booby-trapped car causing a nuclear explosion in Washington or a germ or a chemical one?" But he adds that Iraq would never do such a thing. "This is coming, this story is coming but not from Iraq."

Also at the meeting was Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz, who said Iraq was being wrongly accused of terrorism. "Sir, the biological is very easy to make. It's so simple that any biologist can make a bottle of germs and drop it into a water tower and kill 100,000. This is not done by a state. No need to accuse a state. An individual can do it."

The tapes also reveal Iraq 's persistent efforts to hide information about weapons of mass destruction programs from U.N. inspectors well into the 1990s. In one pivotal tape-recorded meeting, which occurred in late April or May of 1995, Saddam and his senior aides discuss the fact that U.N. inspectors had uncovered evidence of Iraq's biological weapons program—a program whose existence Iraq had previously denied.

At one point Hussein Kamel, Saddam's son-in-law and the man who was in charge of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction efforts can be heard on the tapes, speaking openly about hiding information from the U.N.

"We did not reveal all that we have," Kamel says in the meeting. "Not the type of weapons, not the volume of the materials we imported, not the volume of the production we told them about, not the volume of use. None of this was correct." Shortly after this meeting, in August 1995, Hussein Kamel defected to Jordan, and Iraq was forced to admit that it had concealed its biological weapons program. (Kamel returned to Iraq in February 1996 and was killed in a firefight with Iraqi security forces.)

A spokeswoman for the Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte, said information contained in the transcriptions of the tapes was already known to intelligence officials.

"Intelligence community analysts from the CIA, and the DIA reviewed the translations and found that while fascinating from a historical perspective the tapes do not reveal anything that changes their post war analysis of Iraq's weapons programs nor do they change the findings contained in the comprehensive Iraq Survey group report," the spokeswoman said in a statement.

"The tapes mostly date from early to mid 1990s and cover such topics as relations with the United Nations, efforts to rebuild industries from Gulf war damage and the pre 9/11 situation in Afghanistan."

Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, says the tapes are authentic and show that "Saddam had a fixation on weapons of mass destruction and he had a fixation on hiding what he was doing from the U.N. inspectors." Hoeckstra says there are more than 35,000 boxes of such tapes and documents that the U.S. government has not analyzed nor made public that should also be translated and studied on an urgent basis.

Charles Duelfer, who led the official U.S. search for weapons of mass destruction after the war, says the tapes show extensive deception but don't prove that weapons were still hidden in Iraq at the time of the U.S.-led war in 2003. "What they do is support the conclusion in the report, which we made in the last couple of years, that the regime had the intention of building and rebuilding weapons of mass destruction, when circumstances permitted."

Tierney, who provided ABC News with the tapes, plans to make the 12 hours of recordings public at a nongovernmental meeting — called Intelligence Summit 2006 — this weekend in Arlington, Va. John Loftus, a former federal prosecutor, runs the meeting. "We think this is a tape that is unclassified and available to the public," says Loftus ["I] just want to have it translated and let the tape speak for itself."


ABC News' Hoda Osman and Avni Patel contributed to this report.
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#2
ABC and their exclusive Saddam Tapes

i am listening to Bill Tierney being interviewed right now live on coast to coast am with george norey. bill gave a rating to abc's story on this. D-. he said they have misquoted him on many things and quoted him on saying things he never said. for instance.
"Tierney said the U.S. government is wrong to keep these tapes and others secret from the public. "Because of my experience being in the inspections and being in the military, I knew the significance of these tapes when I heard them," says Tierney. "

Bill just said, he did not say that. He also said that after going through these tapes he has with out a doubt that saddam had wmd's before the u.s. invaded iraq. WTF ABC!!??!!?

he said there are some other things in this story that he did not say. he's till being interviewed at the moment.

Bill said there is more to come, the tapes will be maid public at a summit in the coming weeks.
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#4
alot of them were out of context. i just watched the video on abc and the way they quote saddam its like they were trying to make it look like saddam warned the u.s. of an attack but when i heard bill read the translations in full it came across in a different way. bill's reading of the translations made it seem like saddam knew of an attack that was going to happen on the u.s. and that he not only knew who was behind it, but also had some part in it.
 

XIAN

New Member
#6
PuffnScruff said:
He also said that after going through these tapes he has with out a doubt that saddam had wmd's before the u.s. invaded iraq.
"Before"? As in when? At the time of the invasion? And I don't wanna start a debate, but does anyone think he really would've used them? How many nukes does the US have? If I was a kid in Iraq, I would've been scared to death that the US military would us them on me, not the other way around...
~peace~
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#7
XIAN said:
"Before"? As in when? At the time of the invasion? And I don't wanna start a debate, but does anyone think he really would've used them? How many nukes does the US have? If I was a kid in Iraq, I would've been scared to death that the US military would us them on me, not the other way around...
~peace~
ive heard him say in other interviews that when clinton bombed sites believed to be holding and making wmd's that those sites did not have them because they were moved.

ive also heard him say that their is proof in some of the tapes that saddam had them with in a few years before the invasion.

i dont think saddam would have used them himself. but i think he would have sold them to terrorist organizations that would use them against the u.s.
like i mentioned before, when bill was reading the transcripts out of context it made it seem like saddam was working with organizations who were going to attack the u.s. not directly but through 3rd party sources. which would confirm mainly reports that came out in the later part of the 90's from many news outlets like nyt, newsweek, to readers digest
 
#8
PuffnScruff said:
ive heard him say in other interviews that when clinton bombed sites believed to be holding and making wmd's that those sites did not have them because they were moved.

ive also heard him say that their is proof in some of the tapes that saddam had them with in a few years before the invasion.

i dont think saddam would have used them himself. but i think he would have sold them to terrorist organizations that would use them against the u.s.
like i mentioned before, when bill was reading the transcripts out of context it made it seem like saddam was working with organizations who were going to attack the u.s. not directly but through 3rd party sources. which would confirm mainly reports that came out in the later part of the 90's from many news outlets like nyt, newsweek, to readers digest
You heard him?
 

PuffnScruff

Well-Known Member
#10
arabic187 said:
You heard him?
i was refering to Bill Tierney, like i mentioned above i was listening to him being interviewed on the radio, shortly after the abc report aired on tv, which was more in depth than abc's interview with the him.
 

Latest posts

Donate

Any donations will be used to help pay for the site costs, and anything donated above will be donated to C-Dub's son on behalf of this community.

Members online

No members online now.
Top